Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:28:44.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom, Community and Function: Communitarian Lessons of Medieval Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Cary J. Nederman
Cary J. Nederman
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The communitarian critique of liberal individualism is presently experiencing something of a decline. One of the reasons for the failure of communitarians to make a lasting impact on liberal theory may be the historical precedents to which communitarians have turned, such as Aristotle and civic republicanism. I argue that communitarian theory may more fruitfully draw upon a model of the relation between individual and community derived from the Latin Middle Ages. This approach—communal functionalism—claims that the community is essentially composed neither of individuals nor of citizens but, rather, of functional groups or parts arranged according to their contribution to the community. I consider two variants of this framework, John of Salisbury's “physiological” version and Marsiglio of Padua's “civic” account. I close with an evaluation of the relevance—and also some of the limitations—of the communal functionalist model in relation to the requirements of contemporary communitarian theory.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 977 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beiner, Ronald. 1983. Political Judgement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Robert L., and Constable, Giles, eds. 1982. Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Antony. 1984. Guilds and Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1913. De officiis. Ed. Miller, Walter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Paul Edward. 1983. “Illustre Civitatis et Populi Exemplum: Plato's Timaeus and the Transmission from Calcidius to the End of the Twelfth Century of a Tripartite Scheme of Society.” Mediaeval Studies 45:79–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Avigail. 1991a. “Political Pluralism and Communitarianism.” Ph.D. diss., Queens University.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Avigail. 1991b. “The Community in Communitarianism and Post-War Pluralism.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
Fasolt, Constantin. 1991. Hierarchy and Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1985. “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14:307–22.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1989. “The Permanent Structure of Antiliberal Thought.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1909. Policraticus. Ed. Webb, C. C. J.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1929. Metalogicon. Ed. Webb, C. C. J.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1955. The Letters of John of Salisbury. Vol. 1: The Early Utters. Ed. Millor, W. J., Butler, H. E., and Brooke, C. N. L.. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. 1990. Policraticus. Ed. and trans. Nederman, Cary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Richard. 1985. “A Quarternion of Metaphors for the Hermeneutics of Life.” In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Society for General Systems Research, vol. 1, ed. Banathy, Bela H.. Seaside, CA: SGSR.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1990. Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher. 1988. “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” In Community in America, ed. Reynolds, Charles H. and Norman, Ralph V.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1985. Against Virtue. 2d ed. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Marsiglio of Padua. 1927. Defensor pacis. Ed. Previté-Orton, Charles W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsiglio of Padua. 1979. Oeuvres mineures. Ed. Jeudy, Colette and Quillet, Jeannine. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Sdentifique.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard. 1990. “Aristotle and the Value of Political Participation.” Political Theory 18:195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1986. “The Aristotelian Doctrine of the Mean and John of Salisbury's Concept of Liberty.” Vivarium 24:128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1987a. “The Physiological Significance of the Organic Metaphor in John of Salisbury's Policraticus.” History of Political Thought 8:211–23.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1987b. “Sovereignty, War, and the Corporation: Hegel on the Medieval Foundations of the Modern State.” Journal of Politics 49:500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1988. “A Duty To Kill: John of Salisbury's Theory of Tyrannicide.” Review of Politics 50:365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1990. “Private Will, Public Justice: Household, Community, and Consent in Marsiglio of Padua's Defensor pads.” Western Political Quarterly 43:699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1991. “Knowledge, Consent, and the Critique of Political Representation in Marsiglio of Padua's Defensor pads.” Political Studies 39:19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, Cary J., and Lawson, N. Elaine. 1987. “The Frivolity of Courtiers Follows the Footsteps of Women: Historical Women and the Crisis of Virility in John of Salisbury.” In Ambiguous Realities, ed. Levin, Carole and Watson, Jeanie. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, W. R. 1987. “Superlative Virtue: The Problem of Monarchy in Aristotle's ‘Politics’.” Western Political Quarterly 40:159–78.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. “Aristotelian Social Democracy.” In Liberalism and the Good, ed. Douglass, R. Bruce, Mara, Gerald M., and Richardson, Henry S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oldfield, Adrian. 1990a. “Citizenship: An Unnatural Practice?” Political Quarterly 61:177–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, Adrian. 1990b. Citizenship and Community: Civic Republicanism in the Modern World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1984. “Morality and the Liberal Ideal.” New Republic 190:15–17.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1990. “Machiavelli's Discorsi and the Prehumanist Origins of Republican Ideas.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Struve, Tilman. 1978. Die Entwicklung der Organologischen Staatsauffasung in Mittelalter. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1986. “Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity, and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada.” In Constitutionalism, Citizenship, and Society in Canada, ed. Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. “Cross-Purposes: The Liberal—Communitarian Debate.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. 1985. “Community and Conflict in Aristotle's Politics.” Review of Politics 47:92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.