Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:33:14.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Governmental Regulation of Insurance in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Avard Longley Bishop
Affiliation:
Scheffield Scientific School of Yale University

Extract

On the first of January, 1910, the total amount of life insurance in force in Canada, exculsive of that on the assessment plan, amounted to over 780 millions of dollars. Of this, all, excepting a little less than 68 millions of industrial insurance, represented what we may properly style as ordinary or old line business. The policies to the number of upwards of a million were distributed between 53 different companies of which 23 were Canadian, 16 American, and 14 British. The British companies carried risks amounting in the aggregate to less than 47 millions and they seemed to be, on the whole, inactive in the matter of securing new business. In 1909, 8 of the 14 British companies carrying risks in Canada wrote no new Canadian business at all. On the other hand, the American companies make a much better showing; the sum total of their policies was nearly 218 millions of dollars, of which approximately one-fifth represented industrial insurance. The rest of the business, amounting to over 515 millions, was carried by the Canadian companies themselves. From these figures, it is evident that the home companies are now strongly entrenched within their own field. A comparison of the present situation with that of thirty years ago would show that the risks of the Canadian companies have increased much more rapidly than have those of their American rivals. In 1879, the amount of the policies of each in force in Canada was less than thirty-four millions. In the noteworthy expansion of life insurance which has since taken place, a number of causes have combined to swell the aggregate business of the Canadian companies. Not the least important factor here to be considered is that of sentiment—a desire to develop Canada for the Canadians and to promote and foster home enterprises. Moreover, on the more popular forms of policies, the premium rates offered by the home companies have been, as a rule, lower than those of their neighbors across the border.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See The Chronicle, Banking, Insurance and Finance (Montreal), February 26th, 1909.

2 See The Chronicle, Banking, Insurance and Finance, May 21st, 1909.

3 Report of the Royal Commission on Life Insurance, Ottawa, 1907, p. 1.

4 See the Report of the Royal Commission on Life Insurance, p. 6.

5 For the text of this memorial, see The Chronicle, Insurance and Finance, November 16th, 1906.

6 See The Chronicle, Insurance and Finance, March 8th, 1907; also an address by Honorable George Ross, delivered before the National Association of Life Underwriters, Detroit, September 10th, 1910, published in The Bulletin, Toronto, October 1st, 1910.

7 See The Chronicle, Banking, Insurance and Finance, May 13th, 1910.

8 An excellent summary of the Administration Bill, and a comparative synopsis of the old Insurance Act, the Life Officers' Memorial to the Royal Commission, and the Commissioners' Draft Bill may be found in The Chronicle, Banking, Insurance and Finance, December 27th, 1907.

9 The Insurance Act, 1910, para. 47.

10 See the report of the Royal Commission on Life Insurance, p. 190.

11 See the report of the Royal Commission on Lije Insurance, p. 178.

12 See The Chronicle, Banking, Insurance and Finance, May 11th, 1910.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.