Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T05:41:42.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II. Wartime Currents and Peacetime Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Joseph P. Harris
Joseph P. Harris
Affiliation:
University of California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Federal Executive Reorganization Re-Examined: A Symposium, I
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 40 , Issue 6 , December 1946 , pp. 1137 - 1154
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for instance, Marx, Fritz Morstein, “The Bureau of the Budget; Its Evolution and Present Rôle,” in this Review, Vol. 39 (1945), pp. 653 ff., 869 ff.Google Scholar; Smith, Harold D., “The Budget as an Instrument of Legislative Control and Executive Management,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 4 (1944), pp. 181 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 See Merriam, Charles E., “The National Resources Planning Board,” in this Review, Vol. 38 (1944), pp. 1075 ff.Google Scholar

3 Public Law No. 304, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.

4 See Brownlow, Louis and Others, “The Executive Office of the President: A Symposium,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 1 (1941), pp. 101 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Schmeckebier, Laurence F., “Organization of the Executive Branch of the National Government,” in this Review, Vol. 34 (1939), pp. 959 ff.Google Scholar; Vol. 35 (1940), pp. 450 ff., 650 ff., 1043 ff.

6 See Harris, Joseph P., “The Emergency National Defense Organization,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 1 (1940), pp. 1 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 For this account of wartime experience, the writer has drawn heavily on the excellent forthcoming study, America at War, prepared by a special staff of the Budget Bureau. See also the able analysis by Guliek, Luther, “War Organization of the Federal Government,” in this Review, Vol. 38 (1944), pp. 1166 ff.Google Scholar

8 Public Law No. 395, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.

9 “Reconversion of the Federal Administrative Machinery from War to Peace,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 4 (1944), p. 316.

10 Public Law No. 263, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.

11 Sec. 5(a), par. 6.

12 In the subsequent debates on the President's reorganization plans, it was freely alleged by several members of the House, citing this provision, that Congress did not want the President to touch independent, bipartisan agencies.

13 See Millett, John D. and Rogers, Lindsay, “The Legislative Veto and the Reorganization Act of 1939,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 1 (1940), pp. 176 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 See United States Government Manual, 1945, Appendix A, pp. 590–622; also Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, Report No. 638 to accompany S. 1120, 79th Cong., 1st Sess., 1945.

15 Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Hearings on S. Con. Res. Nos. 64, 65, 66 79th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 32.

16 Isbrandtsen-Moller Co. v. U. S., 14 Fed. Supp. 407 (1936).

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.