Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7pht Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T14:34:51.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2005

DAVID RUEDA
DAVID RUEDA
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In much of the political economy literature, social democratic governments are assumed to defend the interests of labor. The main thrust of this article is that labor is divided into those with secure employment (insiders) and those without (outsiders). I argue that the goals of social democratic parties are often best served by pursuing policies that benefit insiders while ignoring the interests of outsiders. I analyze Eurobarometer data and annual macrodata from 16 OECD countries from 1973 to 1995. I explore the question of whether strategies prevalent in the golden age of social democracy have been neglected and Left parties have abandoned the goal of providing equality and security to the most vulnerable sectors of the labor market. By combining research on political economy, institutions, and political behavior, my analysis demonstrates that insider–outsider politics are fundamental to a fuller explanation of government partisanship, policy-making, and social democracy since the 1970s.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 61 - 74
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addison John T., and Jean-Luc Grosso. 1996. “Job Security Provisions and Employment: Revised Estimates.” Industrial Relations 35 (October): 585– 603.Google Scholar
Alesina Alberto. 1989. “Politics and Business Cycles in Industrialized Democracies.” Economic Policy 8 (April): 55– 98.Google Scholar
Alt James. 1985. “Political Parties, World Demand, and Unemployment.” American Political Science Review 79 (December): 1016– 40.Google Scholar
Alvarez Michael, Geoffrey Garrett, and Peter Lange. 1991. “Government Partisanship, Labor Organization and Macro-Economic Performance.” American Political Science Review 85 (June): 539– 56.Google Scholar
Armingeon Klaus, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegale. 2002. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2001. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
Beck Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634– 47.Google Scholar
Beck Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance.” Political Analysis 6: 1– 36.Google Scholar
Bentolila Samuel, and Giuseppe Bertola. 1990. “Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad Is Eurosclerosis?” Review of Economic Studies 57 (July): 381– 402.Google Scholar
Berger Suzanne and Michael Piore. 1980. Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blanchard O. J., et al. 1986. “Employment and Growth in Europe.” In Restoring Europe's Prosperity, ed. O. J. Blanchard. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blanchard O. and L. Summers. 1986. “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem.” In S. Fisher (ed.), NBER Macroeconomic Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boeri Tito, Axel Börsch-Supan, and Guido Tabellini. 2001. “Would You Like to Shrink the Welfare State? A Survey of European Citizens.” Economic Policy 32 (April): 7– 50.Google Scholar
Boix Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Calmfors Lars. 1994. “Active Labour Market Policy and Unemployment: A Framework for the Analysis of Crucial Design Features.” OECD Working Papers. Paris: OECD.
Calmfors Lars. 1993. “Lessons from the Macroeconomic Experience of Sweden,” European Journal of Political Economy, 9 (March): 25– 72.Google Scholar
Calmfors Lars and Harald Lang. 1995. “Macroeconomic Effects of Active Labour Market Programmes in a Union Wage-Setting Model,” The Economic Journal 105 (May): 601– 18.Google Scholar
Cusack Thomas. 1997. “Partisan Politics and Public Finance.” Public Choice 91 (March): 375– 395.Google Scholar
Dalton Russell. 2002. Citizen Politics. New York: Chatham House.
Doeringer Peter B., and Michael Piore. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Dore Ronald. 1994. “Incomes Policy: Why Now?” In The Return to Incomes Policy, ed. Ronald Dore, Robert Boyer, and Zoë Mars. London: Pinter.
Europa Yearbook. Various years. London: Europa.
Franzese Robert. 1998. “The Political Economy of Public Debt.” Paper presented at the Wallis Conference on Political Economy. Northwestern University, November 1998.
Gabel Matthew, and John Huber. 2000. “Putting Parties in Their Place.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (January): 94– 103.Google Scholar
Garrett Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett Geoffrey, and Peter Lange. 1991. “Political Responses to Interdependence: What's ‘Left’ for the Left?” International Organization 45 (Autumn): 539– 64.Google Scholar
Giddens Anthony. 1998. The Third Way. London: Polity Press.
Hibbs Douglas. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Theory.” American Political Science Review 71 (December): 1467– 87.Google Scholar
Hicks Alexander, and Duane Swank. 1992. “Politics, Institutions and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82.” American Political Science Review 86 (September): 658– 74.Google Scholar
Hsiao Cheng. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huber Evelyne, and John Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iversen Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iversen Torben. 1996. “Power, Flexibility and the Breakdown of Centralized Wage Bargaining.” Comparative Politics 28 (July): 399– 436.Google Scholar
Iversen Torben, and David Soskice. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (December): 875– 93.Google Scholar
Jackman Richard, Christopher Pissarides, and Savvas Savouri. 1990. “Unemployment Policies.” Economic Policy 5 (October): 449– 90.Google Scholar
Janoski Thomas. 1990. The Political Economy of Unemployment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Janoski Thomas. 1994. “Direct State Intervention in the Labor Market.” In The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, ed. Thomas Janoski and Alexander Hicks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
King Desmond. 1995. Actively Seeking Work? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kitschelt Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt Herbert. 1999. “European Social Democracy Between Political Economy and Electoral Competition.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Lazear Edward. 1990. “Job Security Provisions and Employment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (August): 699– 726.Google Scholar
Lindbeck Assar, and Dennis Snower. 1988. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Martin John. 1998. “What Works among Active Labour Market Policies.” OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 35. Paris: OECD.
McDonald Michael and Silvia Mendes. 2001. Parties in Parliaments and Governments, 1950–1995. Political Science Department, Binghamton University—SUNY.
Moene Karl Ove, and Michael Wallerstein. 2003. “Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending.” World Politics 55 (July): 485– 516.Google Scholar
Nickell Stephen. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects,” Econometrica 49 (November): 1417– 26.Google Scholar
OECD. 1994. The OECD Jobs Study. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 1999. Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
Pontusson Jonas. 1995. “Explaining the Decline of European Social Democracy.” World Politics 47 (July): 495– 533.Google Scholar
Powell Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Powell Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rueda David. 2001. “Government Partisanship and Economic Policy: Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies.” Ph.D. Diss. Cornell University.
Rueda David. N.d. “Social Democracy and Active Labor Market Policies: Insiders, Outsiders, and the Politics of Employment Promotion.” British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.
Rueda David, and Jonas Pontusson. 2000. “Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics 52 (April): 350– 83.Google Scholar
Saint-Paul Gilles. 1998. “A Framework for Analysing the Political Support for Active Labor Market Policy.” Journal of Public Economics 67 (February): 151– 65.Google Scholar
Saint-Paul Gilles. 1996. “Exploring the Political Economy of Labour Market Institutions.” Economic Policy, 23 (October): 264– 315.Google Scholar
Scharpf Fritz. 1991. Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Schwartz Herman. 1994. “Small States in Big Trouble.” World Politics 46 (July): 527– 55.Google Scholar
Swank Duane, and Cathie Jo Martin. 2001. “Employers and the Welfare State.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (October): 889– 923.Google Scholar
Visser Jelle. 1996. “Unionization Trends Revisited.” Centre for Research of European Societies and Industrial Relations, Amsterdam.
Wilensky Harold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Woldendorp Jaap, Hans Keman, and In Budge. 2000. Party Government in 48 Democracies (1945–1998). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.