Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:49:10.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on the Meaning of ‘Constitution’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1982

Graham Maddox*
Affiliation:
The University of New England

Abstract

Professor Sartori's 1962 article on constitutionalism in the American Political Science Review was influential in the acceptance of a narrow view of the constitution. Sartori argued that constitution meant specifically limitation on government and underplayed the role of the state in establishing a political order. This article argues that there are good historical reasons for keeping a balanced view of a constitutionalism that maintains a tension between strong government, to create a secure and stable order, and limitation on government power. It therefore attempts to reaffirm McIlwain's more traditional view of the constitution as a combination of gubernaculum and jurisdictio, power and its control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. G. 1958. Political ideas of the American Revolution. 3rd ed. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Akzin, B. 1967. The place of the Constitution in the modern state. Israel Law Review 2.1:516.Google Scholar
Andrews, W. G. 1963. Constitutions and constitutionalism. 2nd ed. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Friedrich, C. J. 1951. The political theory of the new democratic constitutions. In Constitutions and constitutional trends since World War II, ed. Zurcher, A.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, K. 1965. Political power and the governmental process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H. 1958. Constitutionalism ancient and modern. 2nd ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H. 1939. Constitutionalism and the changing world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, W. J. M. 1955. Constitution making. In Man in his relationships, ed. Westman, H.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Morris-Jones, W. H. 1965. On constitutionalism. American Political Science Review 59:439–40.10.1017/S0003055400079697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostwald, M. 1969. Nomos and the beginning of the Athenian democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T. 1940. The relations between Roman law and English common law down to the sixteenth century. Toronto Law Journal 3:2450.10.2307/824596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbone, E. 1967. Roman law in the Anglo-Norman realm. Studia Grattano 11:255–71.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. 1962. Constitutionalism: a preliminary discussion. American Political Science Review 56: 853–64.10.2307/1952788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. 1965a. Democratic theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. 1965b. A rejoinder. American Political Science Review 59:441–44.10.1017/S0003055400079703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review 64: 1033–53.10.2307/1958356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, F. 1945. Bracton on kingship. English Historical Review 60:136–76.10.1093/ehr/LX.CCXXXVII.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheare, K. C. 1966. Modern constitutions. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1968. Libertas as a political idea at Rome during the late republic and early principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wormuth, F. D. 1949. The origins of modern constitutionalism. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.