Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:31:52.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Fallacy of “Idea A”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert T. Golembiewski
Robert T. Golembiewski*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , December 1961 , pp. 885 - 886
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Such an overview is contained in my The Small Group (Chicago, in process), especially chs. 1 and 2.

2 Floyd H. Allport most prominently, if not always consistently, took such a position. See his Social Psychology (New York, 1924), especially p. 4 Google Scholar.

3 For example, this position was taken by Krech, David and Crutchfield, Richard S., Theory and Problems of Social Psychology (New York, 1948), pp. 391, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Levy, Marion J. Jr., The Structure of Society (Princeton, 1952), pp. 88–89 Google Scholar.

5 Bohm, David, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (New York, 1957), especially ch. 2Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.