¹ Laws of Illinois, 1925, pp. 373–377 Google Scholar.

² Laws of New Jersey, 1925, Ch. 8.

³ Laws of Missouri, 1925, p. 301 Google Scholar.

⁴ Laws of Louisiana, 1924, Act. No. 155.

⁵ Acts of the General Assembly, 1923, No. 32. Probably the most “colorful” ballot system is to be found in Minnesota: (1) white ballots for candidates to be voted for by the state at large; (2) pink ballots for constitutional amendments and other state-wide propositions; (3) red ballots for city offices; (4) lavender ballots for city-charter and bond referenda; and (5) blue ballots for any candidates or propositions not provided for above. Separate ballot boxes to match are provided for each kind of ballot. Minnesota General Statutes (1923), §§276–280 Google Scholar.

⁶ Statutes of California, 1925: Concurrent and Joint Eesolutions and Constitutional Amendments, Ch. 69, p. 1401.

⁷ Oklahoma Session Laws, 1925, Ch. 29, p. 36 Google Scholar.

⁸ For the circumstances which led to the adoption of this form of primary, see Barth, H. A., “Oklahoma Adopts Preferential Voting in the Primary,” Nat. Mun. Rev., XIV, 410–413 (July, 1925)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ Acts of the Extra Session of the 40th General Assembly of Iowa, 1924, Ch. 5.

¹⁰ Laws of New Jersey, 1925, Ch. 8.

¹¹ Michigan Public Acts, 1925, No. 351.

¹² Acts of the 41st General Assembly of Iowa, 1925, Ch. 27.

¹³ Laws of Louisiana, 1924, Act No. 215.

¹⁴ Nebraska Session Laws, 1925, Chs. 108, 111, 114 Google Scholar.

¹⁵ Laws of North Dakota, 1925, Ch. 136.

¹⁶ Virginia Acts of Assembly, 1924, Chs. 286, 423.

¹⁷ Laws of Wisconsin, 1925, Ch. 448.

¹⁸ Acts and Resolves of Massachusetts, 1924, Ch. 479. Assistance in the preparation of the two foregoing notes has been received from Professors F. E. Horack, University of Iowa, J. K. Pollock, Jr., University of Michigan, A. B. Hall, University of Wisconsin, and V. J. West, Stanford University.