Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T12:19:45.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reckless Rationalism and Heroic Reverence in Homer's Odyssey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1987

Darrell Dobbs
Darrell Dobbs*
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A decision-theoretic analysis of the central incident of Homer's Odyssey reveals the insufficiency of rational calculation as a guide for political prudence. Surprisingly, the poet distinguishes between two rational and formally identical calculations in no uncertain terms; he condemns one as utter recklessness and praises the other as consummate wisdom. I maintain that this discrepancy is neither an artifact of sloppy editorial patchwork nor the result of a “homeric nod” but instead points toward a politically significant distinction as yet obscured by a merely rationalistic perspective. The recklessness of Odysseus' crewmen, who deliberately slaughter sacred cattle to forestall starvation, consists in their rationalistic transgression of the limits of reason. These limits are most evident in the defiance of commensurability that characterizes the sacred. The wisdom of Odysseus, by contrast, is manifest in his learning to temper reason with respect for the sacred. By virtue of reverence, Odysseus wins his struggle to preserve his psychê, home and regime.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 491 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranson, Peter H. 1984. Judicial Control of the Political Branches: Public Purpose and Public Law. Cato Journal 4:1–64.Google Scholar
Austin, Norman. 1975. Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer's Odyssey. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy 76:169–217.10.1086/259394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1979. For Capital Punishment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. 1953. The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1976. Paradoxes in Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Clay, Jenny Strauss. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, David O. 1985. Iliad 2: Sceptre and Catalogue. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Diamond, Martin. 1959. Democracy and “The Federalist”: A Reconsideration of the Framers' Intent. American Political Science Review 53:52–68.10.2307/1951730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1965. The Expressive Function of Punishment. Monist 43:397–423.10.5840/monist196549326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaumenhaft, Mera. 1982. The Undercover Hero: Odysseus from Dark to Daylight. Interpretation 10:9–41.Google Scholar
Gilder, George. 1981. Wealth and Poverty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Liberty, and Legislation. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Homer, . 1963. Iliad. 2 vols. Ed. Monroe, D. B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Homer, . 1965. Odyssey. 2 vols. Ed. Stanford, W. B.. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 1979. The Best of the Achaens: The Concept of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Owen, Guillermo. 1982. Game Theory. 2d ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1972. Republic. In Platonis Opera, vol. 4, ed. Burnet, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1977. Economic Analysis of Law. 2d ed. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1955. Two Concepts of Rules. The Philosophical Review 64:3–32.10.2307/2182230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H. 1977. Why is the Common Law Efficient? Journal of Legal Studies 6:51–63.10.1086/467562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, W. B. 1985. The Ulysses Theme. 2d ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1979. The Mutual Influence of Theology and Philosophy. The Independent Journal of Philosophy 3:111–18.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1981. Progress or Return? The Contemporary Crisis in Western Civilization. Modern Judaism 1:17–45.10.1093/mj/1.1.17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945. Democracy in America. 2 vols. Translated by Reeve, Henry. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.