Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T05:58:56.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on State Reorganizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John A. Perkins
Affiliation:
University of Delaware

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Council of State Governments, Reorganizing State Government; A Report on Administrative Management in the States and a Review of Recent Trends in Reorganization (Chicago, 1950)Google Scholar.

2 See Organizational Structure and Employee Morale,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 15, pp. 169179 (April, 1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 At a meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Ann Arbor, Michigan, May 22, 1950.

5 See Perkins, John A., “State Management Limited,” National Municipal Review, Vol. 39, pp. 7278 (Feb., 1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Key, V. O., Southern Politics (New York, 1949), pp. 151 ff.Google Scholar

7 Dorr, H. M., Administrative Reorganization of State Government in Michigan, 1921–1936 (Bureau of Government, University of Michigan, 1936), p. 1Google Scholar.

8 In Michigan and some other states there are administrative boards composed of elected officials which are loosely referred to as the governor's cabinet or team. They are not subordinates of the chief executive but are in reality his competitors, even exercising part of his executive authority. See John A. Perkins, loc. cit.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.