Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:09:35.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report from the Laboratory: The Influence of Institutions on Political Elites' Democratic Values in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robert Rohrschneider
Affiliation:
Indiana University

Abstract

The unification of Germany revives several questions about the future of Germany's democracy. Given the socialist-authoritarian background, how supportive are East Germany's elites of liberal democratic rights? Has the socialist-democratic experience instilled into elites a social egalitarian conception of democracies? In what ways, if at all, do elites support direct democracy procedures? I examine political elites' conceptions of democracies in the united Germany in 1991, using a survey of 168 parliamentarians from the united parliament in Berlin. I find that the socialist and parliamentary institutions in the East and the West, respectively, have substantially influenced elites' conceptions of democracies in Germany, leading to a value divergence across the East-West boundary. Yet the findings also suggest that a partial value convergence in terms of liberal democratic rights among postwar elites has taken place. The results support an institutional learning theory, but they also suggest that support for liberal democratic values has been diffused into East Germany.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Burt A.. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1983. “Communism and Political Culture Theory.” Comparative Politics 15:127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney, eds. 1980. The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Baker, Kendall, Dalton, Russell J., and Hildebrandt, Kai. 1981. Germany Transformed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Petra. 1991. “Politische Orientierungen im Uebergang: Eine Analyse politischer Einstellungen der Buerger in West-und Ostdeutschland.” Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 43:433–53.Google Scholar
Beyme, Klaus von. 1971. Politische Eliten. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Jackman, Robert W., 1989. “Democracy, Stability, and Dichotomies.” American Sociological Review 54:612–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, G. R., and Loewenberg, Gerhard. 1973. “The Development of Public Support for Parliament in Germany.” British Journal of Political Science 3:169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, G. R., and Loewenberg, Gerhard, 1974. “The Decay of Support for Monarchy and the Hitler Regime in the Federal Republic of Germany.” British Journal of Political Science 4:453–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, David, Baylis, Thomas A., and Ruesche, Marilyn-meyer. 1989. East Germany in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahon, James E.. 1993. “Conceptual 'Stretching' Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87:845–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conradt, David P. 1974. “West Germany: A Remade Political Culture?Comparative Political Studies 2:222–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1974. “Introduction: Studying Elites in Britain.” In Eii'fes in Western Democracy, ed. Crewe, Ivor. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1967. Society and Democracy in Germany. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1987. “Generational Change in Elite Political Beliefs: The Growth of Ideological Polarization.” Journal of Politics 49:976–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1992. Politics in Germany. 2d edition. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. N.d. “Communists and Democrats: Attitudes Towards Democracy in the Two Germanies.” British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Di Palma, Guiseppe. 1990. To Craft Democracies. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “Putting Up with Fascists in Western Europe: A Comparative, Crosslevel Analysis of Political Tolerance.” Western Political Quarterly 45:237–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1988. “A Culturalist Theory of Political Change.” American Political Science Review 82:789804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edinger, Lewis. 1960. “Post-totalitarian Leadership: Elites in the German Federal Republic.” American Political Science Review 54:5882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edinger, Lewis, and Searing, Donald. 1967. “Social Background in Elite Analysis.” American Political Science Review 61:428–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finifter, Ada W., and Mickiewicz, Ellen, 1992. “Redefining the Political System of the USSR.” American Political Science Review 86:857–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Walter. 1990. “Mentalitaetswandlungen der Jugend in der DDR.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B16/17:2537.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Dieter, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, and Schoebel, Carolin. 1991. “Perspektiven der politischen Kultur im vereinigten Deutschland.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B32/91:3546.Google Scholar
Glaessner, Gert-Joachim. 1989. Die Andere Deutsche Republik. Opladen: Westdeutscher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David. 1987. Models of Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, Dietrich. 1975. Politische Karrieren. Opladen: Westdeutscher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Dietrich, Rebenstorf, Hilke, Werner, Carmilla, and Wessels, Bernhard. 1990. Abgeordnete und Buerger. Opladen: Westdeutscher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higley, John, and Burton, Michael G., 1989. “The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns.” American Sociological Review 54:1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higley, John, and Gunther, Richard, eds. 1992. Eiltes and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula. 1985. “Structural Prerequisites of Elite Integration in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Studies of the Structure of National Elite Groups, ed. Moore, Gwen. Research in Politics and Society Series, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1988. “The Renaissance of Political Culture.” American Political Science Review 82:1203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaase, Max. 1971. “Demokratische Einstellungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” In Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch fuer Politik, vol. 2, ed. Wildenmann, Rudolf. Munich: Guenter Olzog.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1979. “Measuring Ideological Conceptualization.” In Political Action, ed. Barnes, Samuel H. and Kaase, Max. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Krisch, Henry. 1985. The German Democratic Republic. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Kuechler, Manfred. 1992. “The Road to German Unity: Mass Sentiment in East and West Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56:5376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ludz, Peter C. 1972. The Changing Party Elite in East Germany. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
McCauley, Martin. 1983. The German Democratic Republic since 1945. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
McDonough, Peter, Barnes, Samel H., and Lopez-Pina, Antonio. 1986. “The Growth of Democratic Legitimacy in Spain.” American Political Science Review 80:735–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, James P. 1991. “Value Structures in a Developed Socialist System: The Case of Czechoslovakia.” Comparative Politics 23:181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Anna, and Merritt, Richard. 1970. “Public Opinion in Semisovereign Germany.” Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1991. “The German Revolution: The Historical Experiment of the Division of Unification of a Nation as Reflected in Survey Research Findings.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 3:238–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennock, Roland J. 1979. Democratie Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 80:1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1973. The Beliefs of Politicians. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian W. 1990. “Political Science and the Crisis of Authoritarianism.” American Political Science Review 84:320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1974. Rationale Legitimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1993. “Political Elites and Civil Liberties in the United Germany.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Roth, Dieter. 1976. Zum Demokratieverstaendnis von Eliten in der Bundesrepublic Deutschland. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Marylin, Lemke, Christiane. 1989. The Quality of Life in the German Democratic Republic. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Schweigler, Gebhard. 1975. National Consciousness in Divided Germany. Beverley Hill: Sage.Google Scholar
Searing, Donald. 1982. “Rules of the Game in Britain: Can the Politicians Be Trusted?American Political Science Review 76:239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald. 1985. “The Role of the Good Constituency Member and the Practice of Representation in Great Britain.” Journal of Politics 47:348–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, Roberta S., ed. 1989. Political Learning in Adulthood. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1991. “Democratic Dominoes: Diffusion Approaches to the Spread of Democracy in the International System.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35:356–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John, Piereon, James, and Markus, George E.. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1965. “Conclusion: Comparative Political Culture.” In Political Culture and Political Developments, ed. Pye, Lucian W. and Verba, Sidney. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weidenfeld, Werner, Korte, Karl-Rudolf. 1991. Die Deutschen: Profil einer Nation. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Weil, Frederick. 1993. Democratization in Eastern and Western Europe. Vol. 1 of Research on Democracy and Society. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Weil, Frederick. 1989. “The Sources and Structure of Legitimation in Western Democracies.” American Sociological Review 54:682706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Camilla. 1991. “Direktdemokratische Entscheidungsverfahren in der Bundesrespublik Deutschland?” In Politische Klasse und politische Institutionen, ed. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Stoess, Richard, and Wessels, Bernhard. Opladen: Westdeutscher.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.