Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T03:04:26.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Stochastic Process of Alliance Formation Behavior*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard P. Y. Li
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
William R. Thompson
Affiliation:
Florida State University

Abstract

This article attempts to examine alliance formation behavior as a stochastic process amenable to systems interpretation. We test two hypotheses linking the systems characteristics of bipolar distribution/tightly knit bloc structure to serial dependence and stability of alliance formation behavior and multipolar distribution/loosely knit bloc structure to randomness and process instability.

For testing these hypotheses, we have introduced a modeling strategy whereby identification of serial dependence and parameter estimation are accomplished by means of stochastic difference equations and time series autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation functions, and systems interpretation is facilitated by employing its continuous analogue in differential equation form.

We analyze data on three sets of observations corresponding to three distinct periods of international relations: 1815–1914, 1919–1939, 1945–1965. The results do confirm the proposed hypotheses revealing randomness and instability of alliance formation behavior in the multipolar/loosely knit periods of 1815–1914 and 1919–1939 and serial dependence and stability in the bipolar/tightly knit 1945–1965 period. Finally, we consider the implications of these results for the earlier findings, the balance of power model, and the probability of war.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was delivered at the 1976 Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association (Toronto). The authors wish to thank Dinna Zinnes, Richard Hayes and several anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms.

References

Box, George E. P. and Jenkins, Gwilyn (1970). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden Day.Google Scholar
Bremer, Stuart A. (1972). “Formal Alliance Clusters in the Interstate System: 1816–1965.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (1975). “Measuring Systemic Polarity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 19:187216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Philip M. and Moore, David W. (1973). “Inter-Nation Alliances: An Inventory and Appraisal of Propositions.” In Robinson, James A. (ed.), Political Science Annual, Vol. 3. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James A. (1976). “The External Consequences of Regional Integration for Pan-European Relations: Inequality, Dependence, Polarization, and Symmetry.” International Studies Quarterly 20:341–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. and Singer, J. David (1964). “Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability.” World Politics 16:390406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldmann, Kjell (1972). “Bipolarization and Tension in International Systems: A Theoretical Discussion.” Cooperation and Conflict 7:3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Michael (1970). “International Subsystems: Stability and Polarity.” American Political Science Review 64:98132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Jeffrey (1974). “Symmetry and Polarization in the European International System, 1870–1879: A Methodological Study.” Journal of Peace Research 11:229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., Hopmann, P. Terrence, and Sullivan, John D. (1973). Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances: Comparative Studies. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Raymond F. and Mansbach, Richard W. (1973). Structure and Process in International Politics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Job, Brian (1973). “Alliance Formation in the International System: The Application of the Poisson Model.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
Li, Richard (1976a). Applied Time Series/Systems Analysis of Political Behavior, Ch. 9. Mimeographed, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Li, Richard (1976b). “A Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Presidential and House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 20:671–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Richard and Thompson, William R. (1975). “The ‘Coup Contagion’ Hypothesis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 19:6388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Patrick J. and Rood, Robert M. (1975). “Alliance Behavior in Balance of Power Systems: Applying a Poisson Model to Nineteenth Century Europe.” American Political Science Review 69:859–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modelski, George (1963). “The Study of Alliances: A Review.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 7:769–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modelski, George (1974). World Power Concentrations: Typology, Data, Explanatory Framework. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Nogee, Joseph L. (1975). “Polarity: An Ambiguous Concept.” Orbis 18:11931224.Google Scholar
Pandit, S. M. and Wu, Samuel (1976). Time Series and Systems Analysis: Modeling, Forecasting and Control. Mimeographed, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Rapkin, David, Thompson, William R., and Christopherson, Jon A. (1977). “Measuring Bipolarity and Bipolarization: Validation of Alternative Measures.” Mimeographed, Department of Government, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard N. (1963). Action and Reaction in World Politics: International Systems in Perspective. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard N. (1966). “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and the Future.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 10:314–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. (1968). “Components of an Operational Theory of International Alliance Formation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 12:285301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. (1971). “An Empirical Typology of International Military Alliances.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15:262–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. (1976). “Alliances, 1815–1945: Weapons of Power and Tools of Management.” In Knorr, Klaus (ed.), Historical Dimensions of National Security Problems. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin (1966a). “Formal Alliances, 1815–1939: A Quantitative Description.” Journal of Peace Research 3:132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin (1966b). “National Alliance Commitments and War Involvement, 1815–1945.” Peace Research Society (International) Papers 5:109–40.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin (1968). “Alliance Aggregation and the Onset of War: 1815–1945.” In Singer, J. David (ed.), Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart A., and Stuckey, John (1972). “Capability Distribution and the Preservation of Peace in the Major Power Sub-System, 1816–1965.” In Russett, Bruce M. (ed.), Peace, War and Numbers. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M. and Duncan, George T. (1973). “Stochastic Models of International Alliance Activity, 1815–1965.” Mimeographed, Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin and Singer, J. David (1969). “Formal Alliances, 1816–1965: An Extension of the Basic Data.” Journal of Peace Research 6:257–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1964). “The Stability of a Bipolar World.” Daedalus 93:881909.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1967). “International Structure, National Force, and the Balance of World Power.” Journal of International Affairs 21:215–31.Google Scholar
Wold, H. O. A. (1938). A Study in the Analysis of Stationary Time Series, second edition. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.