Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T22:19:11.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detecting Sex-Associated Variation With the Families of MZ and DZ Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C.S. Haley
C.S. Haley*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Birmingham, U.K.
*
Department of Genetics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15, 2TT, U.K.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Phenotypic variation in human population may contain contributions from a number of different sex-associated genetic influences. These influences include maternal effects, the effects of sex-linked loci, and the effects of sex-limited autosomally linked loci. The families produced by MZ and DZ twins provide statistics which permit the detection and estimation of these effects. In particular, they provide statistics derived from various types of age-matched half-sibs and cousins in addition to those derived from the more usually studied full-sib or parent-offspring relationships. Specific models for genetic maternal effects, sex-linkage and sex-limitation are used to explore the use of extended twin design for the detection of and the discrimination between various sex-associated effects. The sample sizes required to detect maternal effects and sex-linkage were considered for some simple cases and it is concluded that comparison derived from the progeny of twins will often provide better tests for these effects than those derived from parent-offspring comparison.

Keywords

Extended twin designTwin familiesMaternal effectsSex-linkageSex-limitation
Type
Behavior Genetic Analysis
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 287 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Cavalli-Sforza, LL, Feldman, MW (1973): Cultural versus biological inheritance: Transmission from parents to children (a theory of the effect of parental phenotypes on children's pheno-types). Am J Hum Genet 25:618–637.Google Scholar
2.Corey, LA, Nance, WE, Berg, K (1978): A new tool for birth defect research: The MZ half-sib model and its extension to grandchildren of identical twins. In Summitt, R (ed.): Birth Defects Original Article Series. New York: Alan R Liss.Google Scholar
3.Eaves, LJ (1977): Inferring the causes of human variation. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A 140:324–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Eaves, LJ, Heath, AC (1981): Sex-limitation and asymmetric assortative mating. In Gedda, L, Parisi, P, Nance, WE (eds.): Twin Reseach 3: Part B, Intelligence, Personality and Development. New York: Alan R Liss, p 73–86.Google Scholar
5.Falconer, DS (1964): Maternal effects and selection response. In: Genetics Today. Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Genetics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
6.Fisher, RA (1970): Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 14th Ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
7.Haley, CS, Jinks, JL, Last, K (1981): The monozygotic twin half-sib method for analysing maternal effects and sex-linkage in humans. Heredity 46:227–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Haley, CS, Last, K (1981): The advantages of analysing human variation using twins and twin half-sibs and cousins. Heredity 47:221–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Kearsey, MJ (1970): Experimental sizes for detecting dominance. Heredity 25:529–542.Google Scholar
10.Lange, K, Westlake, J, Spence, MA (1976): Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method. Ann Hum Genet 39:485–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Martin, NG, Eaves, LJ, Kearsey, MJ, Davies, P (1978): The power of the classical twin study. Heredity 40:97–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Mather, K, Jinks, JL (1963): Correlations between relatives arising from sex-linked genes. Nature 198:314–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Mather, K, Jinks, JL (1971): Biometrical Genetics, 2nd Ed. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
14.Mather, K, Jinks, JL (1982): Biometrical Genetics, 3rd Ed. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
15.Nance, WE (1979): A note on assortative mating and maternal effects. In Sing, CF, Skolnick, M (eds.): Genetic Analysis of Common Diseases: Applications to Predictive Factors in Coronary Disease. New York: Alan R Liss, p 453–464.Google Scholar
16.Nance, WE, Corey, LA (1976): Genetic models for the analysis of data from the families of identical twins. Genetics 83:811–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Rosner, B, Donner, A, Hennekens, CH (1979): Significance testing of interclass correlations from familial data. Biometrics 35:461–471.Google Scholar
18.Snedecor, GW, Cochran, WG (1980): Statistical Methods, 7th Ed. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar