Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T04:20:58.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dominance and Submissiveness Between Twins. I. Perinatal and Developmental Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Irma Moilanen
Irma Moilanen*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Finland
*
Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, SF-90220 Oulu, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Factors predicting dominance and submissiveness between twins were analyzed in a longitudinal study of 234 twin pairs. Boys were found to be physically dominating, while the girls more often were psychically dominating and in the role of the spokesman. Low birth weight, to be second born, or low Apgar score tended to predict submissiveness, but not significantly. The same was true concerning perinatal asphyxia and hypoglycemia, which also showed some potential cumulative effect when occurring simultaneously. Those having developed faster or with higher intelligence were more often the leaders of the twin pair. Probably good neonatal care in modern hospitals tends to prevent perinatal damage, and therefore the previous findings of second born or small birth weight twins being most submissive was not fully established.

Keywords

DominanceSubmissivenessPerinatal morbidityNeurological damageDevelopmentIntelligence
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Koivisto, M, Jouppila, P, Kauppila, A, Moilanen, I, Ylikorkala, O (1975): Twin pregnancy. Neonatal morbidity and mortality. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand, Suppl 44:21–29.Google Scholar
2.Koppitz, EM (1966): The Bender Gestalt Test for Young Children (3rd Ed). New York: Grune & Stratton, pp 1–195.Google Scholar
3.Koppitz, EM (1968): Psychological Evaluation of Children's Human Figure Drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp 11–34.Google Scholar
4.Moilanen, I (1979): To be born as a twin - Risks and sequelae. Thesis, Acta Universitatis Ouluensis D 50;6.Google Scholar
5.Moilanen, I (1986): Psychiatric vulnerability as sequelae of perinatal morbidity. Lecture read in 11th International Congress for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions, 07 21-25, Paris.Google Scholar
6.Tienari, P (1966): On intrapair differences in male twins with special reference to dominancesubmissiveness. Acta Psychiat Scand, Suppl 188.Google Scholar
7.Torgersen, S (1985): Hereditary and environmental factors in the development of moderately severe and mild psychiatric disorders. Thesis. Dept Psychiatry, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
8.Wechsler, D (1949): Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar