Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:21:21.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimates of Genetic Variance for Anterior Fontanelle Development in the NCPP Twin Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Michael Melnick ,
Ntinos C. Myrianthopoulos  and
Joe C. Christian
Michael Melnick*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Developmental Biology, Andrus Gerontology Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Ntinos C. Myrianthopoulos
Affiliation:
Developmental Neurology Branch, NINCDS, Bethesda, Maryland
Joe C. Christian
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis
*
Laboratory for Developmental Biology, Andrus Gerontology Center – 325, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles, CA 90007

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are several dynamic influences on anterior fontanelle development in infants; among them, brain growth, dural attachments, suture development, and osteogenesis. It thus seems reasonable to hypothesize that variation in anterior fontanelle development between infants, related and unrelated, might have a significant genetic component. Anterior fontanelle size was quantitated by the method of Popich and Smith for 94 monozygotic (MZ) and 187 dizygotic (DZ) four-month-old twin pairs. The general model for estimating genetic variance from quantitative twin data was applied to MZ and DZ twins and then separately by chorion type. Since there were significant mean differences between blacks and whites, races were analyzed separately. The within-pair mean square estimates of genetic variance (ĜWT) were highly significant for both blacks (P < 0.02) and whites (P < 0.002). Comparisons of means, total variances, and among-pair mean squares within races revealed no heterogeneity. There were also no significant chorion effects. Since the anterior fontanelle closes at around 1–1½ years of age, it was evaluated at age one in 95 MZ and 194 DZ twin pairs as a qualitative trait – ie, open vs closed, concordance vs discordance. There were no significant differences in proband concordance rates between MZ and DZ twin pairs for either blacks (P > 0.5) or whites (P > 0.10). Again, there were no significant chorion effects. These data suggest that anterior fontanelle developmental variation has a significant genetic variance component at four months of age but not at one year. This finding may be related to the rapid brain growth witnessed between birth and eight to nine months of age.

Keywords

Anterior fontanelleGenetic varianceTwinsChorion effects
Type
Short Note
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 151 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1980

References

REFERENCES

1.Bixler, D: Abnormal development of the skull and cervical spine. In Melnick, M, Shields, ED, Burzynski, NJ (eds): “Craniofacial Genetics: Principles and Practice.” Littleton, Massachusetts: PSG Publishing (in press).Google Scholar
2.Christian, JC, Kang, KW, Norton, JA: Choice of an estimate of genetic variance from twin data. Am J Hum Genet 26:154–161, 1974.Google Scholar
3.Christian, JC, Norton, JA: A proposed test of the difference between the means of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26:49–54, 1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Emery, AEH: “Methodology in Medical Genetics.” Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1976, pp 84–85.Google Scholar
5.Myrianthopoulos, NC: Congenital malformations in twins: Epidemiologic survey. Birth Defects 11(8):1–39, 1975.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Nishimura, H, Tanimura, T: “Clinical Aspects of the Teratogenicity of Drugs.” Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1976.Google Scholar
7.Niswander, KR, Gordon, M: “The Women and Their Pregnancies.” Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
8.Popich, G, Smith, DW: Fontanels: Range of normal size. J Pediatr 80:749–752, 1972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed