Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T02:49:27.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of a Peculiar Type of Hypodontia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Navnit S. Mitter
Navnit S. Mitter*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Punjabi University, Patiala, India
*
Department of Human Biology, Punjabi University, Patiala 147002, India

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A peculiar type of hypodontia is described in two opposite sexed siblings and considered to be inherited as an autosomal recessive trait

Type
Short Notes
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 24 , Issue 3-4 , 07-10 1975 , pp. 323 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1975

References

REFERENCES

Bourgeois, D.A. 1962. Cited by Rosenzweig and Garbarski 1965.Google Scholar
Brekhus, P.J., Oliver, C.P., Montelius, G. 1944. A study of the pattern and combination of congenially missing teeth in man. J. Dent. Res., 23: 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E.B. 1961. Genetics for Medical Students. [5th Edition]. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Füst, T. 1924. Cited by Shultz 1932.Google Scholar
Garn, S.M., Lewis, A.B., Kerewsky, R.S. 1963. Third molar agenesis and size reduction of the remaining teeth. Nature (Lond.), 200: 488–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garn, S.M., Lewis, A.B. 1969. Effect of agenesis on the crown size profile pattern. J. Dent. Res., 48: 1314.Google Scholar
Garn, S.M., Lewis, A.B. 1970. The gradient and pattern of crown size reduction in simple hypodontia. Angle Orthod., 40: 51–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Keene, H.J. 1965. The relationship between third molar agenesis and the morphological variability of the molar teeth. Angle Orthod., 35: 289–298.Google ScholarPubMed
McQuillen, J.H. 1870. Cited by Shultz 1932.Google Scholar
Modi, N.J. 1975. Edited. Modi's Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology [19th Edition], Bombay: Tripathy.Google Scholar
Montagu, M.F.A. 1940. The significance of the variability of the upper lateral incisor teeth in man. Hum. Biol., 12: 323.Google Scholar
Parreidt, I. 1886. Cited by Shultz 1932.Google Scholar
Reboul, 1897. Cited by Shultz 1932.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, K.A., Garbarski, D. 1965. Numerical aberrations in the permanent teeth of grade school children in Jerusalem. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 23: 277–284.Google Scholar
Sergi, 1914. Cited by Shultz 1932.Google Scholar
Shourie, K.L. 1946. Eruption of teeth in India. Indian J. Med. Res., 34: 105.Google Scholar
Shultz, A.H. 1925. Studies on the evolution of human teeth. Dental Cosmos, 47: 935–947. and 1053-1063.Google Scholar
Shultz, A.H. 1932. The hereditary tendency to eliminate the upper lateral incisors. Hum. Biol., 4: 34–40.Google Scholar
Shultz, A.H. 1934. Inherited reduction in the dentition of man. Hum. Biol., 6: 627–631.Google Scholar
Sidhu, L.S., Gupta, P. 1973. Sequence and age of eruption of permanent teeth in the Punjabi population of Patiala. The East. Anthropol., 26: 261–270.Google Scholar
Thomas, L.C. 1926. Five studies in human heredity. Eugen. News, 11: 150–153. and 155-159.Google Scholar