Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:50:24.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living Habits and Personality Development of Adolescent Twins: A Longitudinal Follow-up Study in a Birth Cohort from Pregnancy to Adolescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

I. Moilanen  and
P. Rantakallio
I. Moilanen*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Finland
P. Rantakallio
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Science, University of Oulu, Finland
*
Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, SF 90220 Oulu, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The living habits of 289 twins in a one-year birth cohort beginning during pregnancy and followed up to adolescence were compared with those of 11,623 singletons and two sets of controls matched either by maternal factors and place of residence only or by these and perinatal morbidity, all from the same cohort. The twins went in for sports more often than the singletons or any kind of controls. A nonsignificant trend was found indicating that twins smoked less often than their matched controls. The twins also used alcohol less often than their controls. The intrapair similarities of twins were higher than the similarities of twins and either type of controls in all four variables tested: sports, smoking, use of alcohol, as well as having been drunk.

Keywords

TwinsSingletonsAdolescenceSportsSmokingAlcohol
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 215 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Goldsmith, H, Gottesman, I 1981: Origins of variation in behavioural style. A longitudinal study of temperament in young twins. Child Dev 52:91–103.Google Scholar
2.Green, M, Solnitt, AJ 1964: Reactions to the threatened loss of a child: a vulnerable child syndrome. Pediatrics 34:58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Koch, H (1966): Twins and Twin Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
4.Matheny, A, Dolan, A 1980: A twin study of personality and temperament during middle childhood. J Res Pers 14:224–234.Google Scholar
5.McNeill, AD, Jarvis, MJ, Stapleton, JA, Russe, MAH, Eiser, JR, Gammage, P, Gray, EM 1988: Prospective study of factors predicting uptake of smoking in adolescents. J Epidemiol Comm Health 43:72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Mittler, P (1971): The Study of Twins. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
7.Moilanen, I 1987: Inter-twin relationships and mental health. Nord Psykiatr Tidsskr 41:279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Moilanen, I 1988: Psychic vulnerability as a sequel to perinatal morbidity. In Arajärvi, T (ed): The Psychiatric Problems and Conduct Disorders of Small Children. Helsinki Lastenpeykiatrian tutkimussäätiön julkaisuja 2; 1:29–36.Google Scholar
9.Moilanen, I, Rantakallio, P (1990): The growth, development and education of Finnish twins. Growth Dev Aging (in press).Google Scholar
10.Paluzny, M, Abelson, AG (1975): Twins in a child psychiatry clinic. Am J Psychiatry 13:434–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Plomin, R, Rowe, D 1977: A twin study of temperament in young children. J Psychol 97:107–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Rantakallio, P (1969): Groups at risk in low birth weight infants and perinatal mortality. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 193.Google Scholar
13.Rantakallio, P 1988: A longitudinal study of the Northern Finland birth cohort for 1966. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2:59–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Scarr, S, Carter-Salzman, L 1979: Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behav Genet 9:527–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Schave, B, Ciriello, J (1983): Identity and Intimacy between Twins. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
16.Wilson, R, Harpring, E 1977: Twins and siblings: Concordance for school-age mental development. Child Dev 48:211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar