Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-nr6nt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:52:30.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Qualitative Value in Finger Prints – Mother/child Correlation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bo Brismar*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Forensic-Anthropological Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, (Sverige)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The author has worked-out a new system of finger-prints analysis through bringing together the types of pattern of the various fingers to a total qualitative value of the following 5 types: A-pattern 2.3%, AL-pattern 3.5%, L-pattern 61.8%, LW-pattern 21.4%, W-pattern 11.0%.

2. Calculations of frequency have shown that sex difference does not exist with respect to the various types of total qualitative value.

3. Mother/child calculations of correlation in tetrachoric tables have given the following results:

a) L/W: χ2 = 34.38; r = 0.46 ± 0.06;

b) A, AL, L/LW, W: χ2 = 27.38; r = 0.31 ± 0.05;

c) L/LW: χ2 = 3.75; r = 0.13 ± 0.07.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1965

References

Bonnevie, K.: Studies on papillary patterns of human fingers. Journal of Genetics 15, 1, 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnevie, K.: Lassen sich die Papillarmuster der Fingerbeere für Vaterschaftsfragen praktisch verwerten. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, 51, 539, 1927.Google Scholar
Cummins, H. & Midlo, C.: Finger-prints, palms and soles. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Galton, F.: Method of indexing finger-marks — proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 49, 540, 1891.Google Scholar
Gruneberg, H.: Untersuchungen über die Asymetrie der Tast-figuren. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungsund Vererbungslehre 47, 79, 1928.Google Scholar
Gruneberg, H.: Die Vererbung der menschlichen Tastfiguren. Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre 46, 285, 1928.Google Scholar
Heindl, R.: System und Praxis der Daktyloskopie, Leipzig, 1922.Google Scholar
Holt, S. B.: A quantitative survey of the finger-prints of a small sample of the British population. Annals of Eugenics 14, 329, 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, S. B.: Genetics of dermal ridges. Inheritance of total finger ridge-count. Annals of Eugenics 17, 140, 1952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S. B.: Genetics of dermal ridges. Bilateral asymmetry in finger ridge-counts. Annals of Eugenics 18, 211, 1954.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, S. B.: Genetics of dermal ridges: frequency distributions of total fingers ridge-count. Annals of Human Genetics 20, 270, 1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, S. B.: Palm-prints and their uses in Medical Biology. Cerebral Palsy Bulletin, 3, 333, 1961.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, S. B.: Quantitative genetics of finger-print patterns. British Medicine Bulletin 17, 247, 1961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer-Heydenhagen, G.: Die palmaren Hautleisten bei Zwillingen. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 33, 1, 1934.Google Scholar
Steffens, C.: Über Zehenleisten bei Zwillingen. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 37, 218, 1938.Google Scholar