Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T03:33:41.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Wood of the Ulu Burun Diptych

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Peter Warnock  and
Michael Pendleton
Peter Warnock
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Michael Pendleton
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the fall of 1988, Cemal Pulak, acting field director and assistant director of the Ulu Burun excavations, asked the authors to identify the wood used in the diptych found on the fourteenth- or very early thirteenth-century Ulu Burun shipwreck. Although it has been stated generally that Greco-Roman writing tablets were made of boxwood, other woods were also used for writing tablets in various periods of antiquity. The second oldest known writing-boards, from 8th-century Nimrud, were made of walnut (Juglans nigra), and from Assyrian records we know that writing-boards were constructed of tamarisk, cypress and cedar woods. Geography clearly played a role in the choice of wood. At the port of Roman London, for example, “most of the twenty-two fragments of writing tablets recovered from the recent waterfront excavations were of the wax-impressed type made from larch, cedar or silver fir, suggesting that they … were brought over [from the continent] as finished products”; the only boxwood tablet, perhaps locally made, was not of the type that held wax.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 41 , December 1991 , pp. 107 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bass, G. F., Pulak, D., Collon, D., and Weinstein, J., “The Bronze Age Shipwreck at Ulu Burun: 1986 Campaign,” AJA 93 (1989) 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar with fig. 19. For the location of Ulu Burun and other places mentioned in this article see map, above, p. 99.

2 Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible 1962: 459Google Scholar.

3 Mallowan, M. E. L., “The Excavations at Nimrud (Kalhu),” Iraq 16 (1954) 98Google Scholar; idem., Nimrud and its Remains I (New York, 1966) 153; Wiseman, D. J., “Assyrian Writing Boards,” Iraq 17 (1955) 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Wiseman, loc. cit. (n. 3); Mallowan, , Iraq 16 (1954) 103Google Scholar. Interestingly, the Akkadian word taskarinnu has been translated both as boxwood and walnut (Wiseman, loc. cit., 3–4; Mallowan, , Nimrud and Its Remains I, pp. 153, 156Google Scholar), though its identification as boxwood now seems to be correct (Landsberger, , Welt des Orient 1 (1950) 368Google Scholar).

5 Milne, G., The Port of Roman London (London, 1985) 67Google Scholar.

6 Robards, A. W., “An Introduction to Techniques for Scanning Electron Microscopy of Plant Cells,” in Hall, J. L., ed., Electron Microscopy and Cytochemistry of Plant Cells (New York, 1978) 358–90Google Scholar.

7 Leney, L. and Casteel, R. W., “Simplified Procedure for Examining Charcoal Specimens for Identification,” Journal of Archaeological Science 2 (1975) 153–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Fahn, A., Werker, E., and Baas, P., Wood Anatomy and Identification of Trees and Shrubs from Israel and Adjacent Regions (Jerusalem, 1986)Google Scholar; Barefoot, A. C. and Hankins, F. W., Identification of Modern and Tertiary Woods (Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar; Butterfield, B. G. and Meylan, B. A., Three-Dimensional Wood Structure: An Ultrastructural Approach2 (New York, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; IAWA Committee, “Standard List of Characters Suitable for Computerized Hardwood Identification,” International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin [IAWA Bulletin] n.s. vol. 2 (1981) 99–110Google Scholar; idem., “IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Hardwood Identification,” IAWA Bulletin n.s. vol. 10.3 (1989) 219–332; and Wheeler, E. A. et al. , “Computer-Aided Wood Identification”, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 474 (1986)Google Scholar.

9 LaPasha, C. A., “General Unknown Entry and Search System,” North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 474A (1986)Google Scholar; Wheeler, op. cit. (n. 8).

10 Werker, E., personal communication, 1988Google Scholar; Lucas, A., Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries4 (London, 1962) 431–2Google Scholar.

11 Meiggs, R., Trees and Timber in the Ancient Mediterranean World (New York, 1982) 417Google Scholar.

12 Dossin, G., Syria XXXII (1955), 13Google Scholar; Brown, J. P., The Lebanon and Phoenicia I (Beirut, 1969) 177–8Google Scholar.

13 Meiggs, op. cit. (n. 11) 73.

14 Luckinbill, D. D., Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia, vols. I and II (1926; repr. New York, 1968) 275Google Scholar; Oppenheim, A. L., “Babylonian and Assyrian Historical Texts,” in ANET p. 282Google Scholar.

15 Moran, W. L., Les Lettres d'el Amarna (Paris, 1987) 339 and 601Google Scholar.

16 Meiggs, op. cit. (n. 11) 73.

17 Edlin, H. and Nimmo, M., eds., The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Trees (London, 1978) 186Google Scholar; Hora, B., ed., The Oxford Encyclopedia of Trees of the World (New York, 1986) 227–8Google Scholar.

18 Meiggs, op. cit. (n. 11) 294.

19 Personal communication, 1988.

20 Davidson, G. R., Corinth XII. The Minor Objects (Princeton, 1952) 179Google Scholar with n. 1. A medieval Muslim handbook of market supervision stated that combs were to be made only of boxwood; see Goitein, S. D., A Mediterranean Society IV (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1983) 224Google Scholar.

21 Meiggs, op. cit. (n. 11) 280, 426.

22 Edlin and Nimmo, op. cit. (n. 17) 186; B. Hora, op. cit. (n. 17) 228.

23 Werker, , personal communication, 1988Google Scholar.

24 Wulff, H. E., The Traditional Crafts of Persia (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1966) 99–101Google Scholar; for Turkey, Zias, J., personal communication, 1990Google Scholar.

25 Pulak, C., personal communication, 1989Google Scholar.

26 Rimmer, J., Ancient Musical Instruments of Western Asia in the Department of Western Asiatic Antiquities, The British Museum (London, 1969) 17Google Scholar.

27 Meiggs, op. cit. (n. 11) 280.

28 Rimmer, loc. cit. (n. 26).

29 Lacheman, E. R., “Appendix D: Epigraphic Evidence of the Material Culture of the Nuzians,” in Starr, R. F. S., Nuzi I, pp. 528–44Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., 573, 540.

3l Lucas, op. cit. (n. 10) 429, 431–2.

32 Meiggs, op. cit. (n. 11) 296.

33 Bass, G. F., “The Bronze Age Shipwreck At Ulu Burun (Kas): 1984 Campaign,” AJA 90 (1986) 269, 271–2, 294–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Oldest Known Shipwreck Reveals Splendors of the Bronze Age,” National Geographic 172.6 (1987) 697–701Google Scholar.

34 Pulak, C., “The Bronze Age Shipwreck at Ulu Burun, Turkey: 1985 Campaign,” AJA 92 (1988) 33–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.