Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T13:14:32.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial rearing as a system for evaluating male lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. A. R. Davies ,
J. B. Owen  and
J. L. Read
D. A. R. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
J. L. Read
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, MK2 2EF
Get access

Abstract

The use of an artificial rearing system to provide controlled environment conditions for performance testing of male lambs was investigated in two trials. A sample of lambs from 5 fat-lamb sire breeds was included.

Performance during the initial restricted milk-feeding period was uniform but large differences in solid food intake gave variable performance in the adjustment period immediately following weaning. Lambs were evaluated from 40 days onwards in terms of growth rate and efficiency of food conversion. Some breed differences were significant and the variation within groups was sufficiently high to suggest that performance might be improved by within-group selection.

Estimates from Trial 2 show that food conversion efficiency was related to growth rate, but early and late performance in the evaluation period were not correlated (r = 0·12, 0·16 and 0·14 for growth rate, food intake and efficiency, respectively). Some refinements of the method are suggested, and it is concluded that the system could provide suitable conditions for testing male lambs at an early age without the variable influence of the dam.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 31 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bichard, M. and Yalcin, B. C. 1964. Crossbred sheep production. III. Selection for growth and carcass attributes in the second-cross lamb. Anitn. Prod. 6: 179–187.Google Scholar
Botkin, M. P. 1955. Selection for efficiency of gain in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 1176 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Bowman, J. C. and Broadbent, J. S. 1966. Genetic parameters of growth between birth and sixteen weeks in Down cross sheep. Anim. Prod. 8: 129–135.Google Scholar
Broadbent, J. S. and Watson, J. H. 1967. Sires' own performance as an indication of progeny performance in testing Suffolk rams for growth rate. Anim. Prod. 9: 99–106.Google Scholar
Davies, D. A. R. and Owen, J. B. 1967. The intensive rearing of lambs. 1. Some factors affecting performance in the liquid feeding period. Anim. Prod. 9: 501–508.Google Scholar
Harrington, R. B., Brothers, D. G. and Whiteman, J. V. 1962. Heritability of gain of lambs measured at different times and by different methods. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neimann-Sorensen, A. and Beck Anderson, B. 1974. General recommendations on procedure for performance and progeny testing for beef characters. Appendix 2. Livestock Prod. Sci. 1: 44.Google Scholar
Olson, L. W., Dickerson, G. E. and Glimp, H. A. 1976. Selection criteria for intensive market lamb production: growth traits. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 78–89.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B., Davies, D. A. R. and Ridgman, W. J. 1969. The effects of varying the quantity and distribution of liquid feed in lambs reared artificially. Anim. Prod. 11: 1–9.Google Scholar
Sutherland, T. M. 1965. The correlation between feed efficiency and rate of gain, a ratio and its denominator. Biometrics 21: 739–749.Google Scholar
Thrift, F. A., Whiteman, J. V. and Kratzer, D. D. 1973. Genetic analysis of preweaning and postweaning lamb growth traits. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 640–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar