Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:33:59.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. L. Blaxter  and
R. S. Wilson
K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
R. S. Wilson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Get access

Summary

1. The energy value of three hays cut at three stages of maturity was. measured by calorimetric methods and, in addition, the amounts of the hays consumed voluntarily by sheep were measured. Voluntary intake was alsa measured when 200, 500, 800 and 1,200 g. of pelleted concentrates were given.

2. The metabolisable energy values of the three hays measured at the-maintenance level were 2·45, 2·26 and 2·16 kcal./g. for cuts 1, 2 and 3-respectively (cut 1 being the earliest). The net energy values for fat production were 0·96, 0·85 and 0·68 kcal./g. respectively.

3. The apparent digestibility of the hays fell with increasing intake, but supplementation with concentrates increased their apparent digestibility.

4. The voluntary intake of the hays given as the sole food was 70, 62 and 57 g./kg. W0·73 for the three cuts, respectively. When concentrates were given in increasing amounts, the intake of cuts 2 and 3 increased to maxima of 65 g. and 64 g./kg. W0·73 respectively and thereafter declined. With cut 1, intake of hay declined even with the smallest intake of concentrates. Voluntary intake of the hays was maximal when the protein content of the whole ration was 8·5%.

5. When no supplement was given the digested energy per sheep per day supplied by cut 1 was 64% greater than that supplied by cut 3. When 800 g. concentrates were given, however, the ration including the early cut of hay provided only 2% more energy than that including the late cut.

6. It is shown that if hay were given as the sole food cut 3, which produced 57% more weight of crop per acre, would provide 38% more metabolisable energy/acre and 11% more net energy (starch equivalent)/acre than would cut 1. The late cut would also enable 92% more sheep to be kept feeding to maximal appetite on an acre of produce. However, the total live-weight gain per acre would be only 25% of that obtained with thefirstcut.

7. Comparable calculations have been made for the experiments in which concentrates were given. It is shown that here too optimal times of cutting can only be assessed in terms of estimates of animal production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1963 , pp. 27 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, D. G., 1960. Calorimetric determination of the net energy value of dried S 23 ryegrass at 4 stages of growth. Proc. VIIIth int. Grassl. Congr., p. 485.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., 1961. The utilisation of the energy of food. Proc. 2nd Conf. on Energy Metabolism. Europ. Assoc. Anim. Prod. (In press).Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Wilson, R. S., 1961. The regulation of food intake by sheep. Anim. Prod., 3: 51.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wilson, R. S., 1962. The voluntary intake of roughages by steers. Anim. Prod., 4: 351.Google Scholar
Brobeck, J. R., 1957. Neural control of hunger, appetite and satiety. Yale J. Biol. Med., 29: 565.Google ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C., 1962. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. Brit. J. Nutr., 16: 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, J. L., 1961. The feeding of livestock. J. Roy. agric. Soc., England, 122: 175.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Blaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G., 1958. Analytical and other techniques used in respiration calorimetry and their errors. Proc. 1st Symposium on Energy Metabolism. Europ. Assoc. Anim. Prod., No. 8, p. 157.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., 1953. Urea as a protein replacement for ruminants: A review. J. Dairy Sci., 36: 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, R., 1958. Kritische Betrachtungen über die Entwicklung der Stärkewertlehre Oskar Kellners. Wiss. Abh. dtsch. Akad. Landw., Berlin, No. 31.Google Scholar
Tosic, J., 1949. Effect of small quantities of a yeast preparation on the recovery of appetite in sheep. Brit. J. Nutr., 3: 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L., 1958. Developments in the design of closed-circuit respiration apparatus for animals weighing up to 70 kg. Proc. 1st Symposium on Energy Metabolism. Europ. Assoc. Anim. Prod., No. 8, p. 85.Google Scholar