Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T19:51:22.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical processing of wheat straw and cotton by-products for fattening cattle 2. Performance of animals receiving material after drying and pelleting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station andThe Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel
D. Levy
Affiliation:
Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station andThe Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel
Y. Folman
Affiliation:
Nve Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station andThe Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Two fibrous roughages, wheat straw (WS) and cotton hulls (CH), were either untreated or treated with 30 g/kg or 60 g/kg of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), the residual NaOH was either unneutralized or neutralized with sulphuric acid, and the materials were then pelleted. The effects of these treatments on the nutritive value of the two roughages were examined in an arrangement that differed from the factorial 2 × 3 × 2 = 12 in that only one control group was included for each roughage. Digestibility trials, in vitro and in vivo, and a 7-month feeding trial were carried out. Concentrates were limited in the feeding trial to 6 kg/head per day, and roughages were offered ad libitum.

Dry matter digestibility in vitro was significantly higher on CH than on WS and was significantly increased by NaOH treatment. Level of NaOH and neutralization of residual alkali had no significant effect. Intake of WS was increased by treatment with 30 g NaOH/kg in the digestibility and feeding trials. Increasing the level of NaOH to 60 g/kg reduced intake of both roughages. Digestibility of organic matter of WS was increased by NaOH treatment at both levels, by 25 to 30%, while that of CH was improved significantly only by the higher level. Neutralization had no effect. The actual intake of roughages was 30 to 35% of the entire ration. The rate of gain of animals offered roughages treated with 30 g NaOH/kg was non-significantly increased, and that of animals offered roughages treated with 60 g NaOH/kg was reduced significantly in comparison with the control. Animals offered NaOH-treated roughages had a significantly higher dressing percentage, and those offered treated WS had a greater fat trim than the control animals. Efficiency of conversion of metabolizable energy into live or carcass weight for both roughages was improved only with the neutralized 30 g NaOH/kg treatment. Comparing the performance in this study with that of a former study of similar design in which the same roughages were offered wet, revealed no marked advantage from pelleting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, I. S., Naik, D. G. and Jackson, M. G. 1976. The effect of level of groundnut cake supplementation on the digestibility of sodium hydroxide spray-treated and untreated paddy straw rations. In Improved Utilisation of Agricultural Waste Materials and Industrial By-products as Livestock Feed. Research Progress Report, 1975–1976, p. 46. G. B. Pant University, Pantnagar.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. C. and Ralston, A. T. 1973. Chemical treatment of ryegrass straw: in vitro dry matter digestiblity and compositional changes. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 148152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. and Davidson, J. L. 1966. The voluntary intake of food by sheep and cattle in relation to their energy requirements for maintenance. Anim. Prod. 8: 7583.Google Scholar
Carmona, J. F. and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1972. The digestibility and acceptability to sheep of chopped or milled barley straw soaked or sprayed with alkali. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 477485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulombe, J. J. and Favreau, L. 1963. A new simple semi-micro method for the calori- metric determination of urea. Clin. Chem. 9: 102108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Demarquilly, C. and Breton, J. 1976. [The feeding value of cereal straws and its improvement by physcal or chemical treatments. Proc. Franco-Swedish Conf. Feeding and Management of Ruminants.] Institut National de Recherche Agronomique, Thiex, France.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple-range and multiple-F tests. Biometrics 11: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, E. S., Marco, G. J. and Emery, E. M. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analysis of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 17681771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Walker, H. G., Kohler, G. O. and Hart, M. R. 1976. Feedlot response of beef steers to diets containing NaOH or NH3 treated rice straw. Proc. 15th California Feeders Day, pp. 3947. Univ. California, Davis.Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Walker, H. G., Kohler, G. O., Waiss, A. C. Jr, Graham, R. P., East, N. E. and Hart, M. R. 1974. Nutritive value of NaOH and NH3 treated rice straw. J. Anim. Sci. 38: 1342 (Abstr).Google Scholar
Goerino, H. K. and van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses. Agric. Handbk, No. 379. United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1976. Improving the nutritive value of straw by alkali treatment. ARC Res. Rev. 2: 6770.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Reid, G. W. 1973. The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening cattle and sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 3: 57 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Holzer, Z., Tagari, H., Levy, D. and Volcani, R. 1976. Soaking of complete fattening rations high in poor roughage. 2. The effect of moisture content and of particle size of the roughage component on the performance of male cattle. Anim. Prod. 22: 4153.Google Scholar
Honing, Y. van der. 1975. Intake and utilization of energy of rations with pelleted forages by dairy cows. Agric. Res. Rep., No. 836. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. G. 1977. Review article: The alkali treatment of straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2: 105130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z., Neumark, H. and Folman, Y. 1977. Chemical processing of wheat straw and cotton by-products for fattening cattle. 1. Performance of animals receiving the wet material shortly after treatment. Anim. Prod. 25: 2737.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Volcani, R. 1968. The effect of age and live weight on feed conversion and yield of saleable meat of intact Israeli Friesian male calves. Anim. Prod. 10: 325330.Google Scholar
Maeng, W. J., Mowat, D. N. andBiLANSKi, W. K. 1971. Digestibility of sodium hydroxide-treated straw fed alone or in combination with alfalfa silage. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 743747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehmet, E. A. 1972. Improving the available energy value of barley straw by treatment with sodium hydroxide. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Mowat, D. N. 1972. Processing forages with sodium hydroxide. Seminar, Dept Anim. Sci., Iowa State Univ., Ames, la.Google Scholar
Mowat, D. N. 1973. Processing forages with sodium hydroxide. Proc. 9th a. Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf, Toronto, pp. 3439.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1976. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, No. 4. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 5th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. B., Knox, J. H., Ray, E. E. and Neumann, A. L. 1967. Effects of grinding and pelleting a ration on performance of yearling steers. Bull. New Mex. State Univ., No. 512.Google Scholar
Ololade, B. G., Mowat, D. N. and Winch, J. E. 1970. Effect of processing methods on the in vitro digestibility of sodium hydroxide treated roughages. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 657662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packett, L. V. and McCune, R. W. 1965. Determination of steam-volatile organic acids in fermentation media by gas-liquid chromatography. Appl. Microbiol. 13: 2227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rexen, F., Stigsen, P. and Kristensen, V. Früs. 1976. The effect of a new alkali technique on the nutritive value of straws. In Feed Energy Sources for Livestock (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 6582. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Round, R. M. 1976. Mechanical and chemical treatment of cereal straw to improveits feed value for ruminants. Tech. Inf. Circ. Livestock Branch, No. 27. Dept. Agric. Fish., S. Australia.Google Scholar
Singh, M. and Jackson, M. G. 1971. The effect of different levels of sodium hydroxide spray treatment of wheat straw on consumption and digestibility by cattle. J. agric. Set, Camb. 77: 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigsen, P. 1974. Panel Discussion, Session Three. In Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers No. 8 (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 235239. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Tagari, H. 1969. Comparison of the efficiency of proteins contained in lucerne hay and soya-bean meal for sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 23: 455470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. T., Bradley, N. W. and Little, C. O. 1965. Ruminal volatile fatty acid concentrations and performance of steers fed different levels and forms of hay and grain. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 11791183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umtjnna, N. N. and Klopfenstein, T. 1972. Response of lambs fed pressure treated wheat straw. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 1136 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Whanger, P. D. 1972. Sulfur in ruminant nutrition. Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 15: 225255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmer, H. J., Bergner, H., Muller, J. and Marienburg, J. 1974. [Studies on the characterization of straw pellets. 5. Preparation and chemical analysis of wheat straw pellets. Arch. Tierernahr. 24: 681688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar