Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:35:33.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of feeding saltbush and sodium chloride on energy metabolism in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Arieli ,
E. Naim ,
R. W. Benjamin  and
D. Pasternak
A. Arieli
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot 76100, Israel
E. Naim
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot 76100, Israel
R. W. Benjamin
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Station, The Negev, Israel
D. Pasternak
Affiliation:
Boyko Institute for Agriculture and Applied Biology, Beer-Seva, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The effect of consumption of saltbush and sodium chloride on energy metabolism in sheep was investigated. Twenty-four Awassi wethers were fed at maintenance level and allotted to three treatments: saltbush (Atriplex barclayana), salt (NaCl) and control. Daily mineral intakes with these diets were 149, 158 and 57 g, respectively. The saltbush had been irrigated with an equal-part mixture of seawater and fresh water and contained 15 g nitrogen and 310 g ash per kg. Energy and nitrogen balance were conducted using indirect calorimetry. The disappearance of organic matter and nitrogen from saltbush in the rumen was studied by the polyester bag technique.

Water intake of animals fed a high salt diet was 2·9 times higher and urine excretion was 3·7 times higher than in the control. Digested energy was proportionately 0·616 of dietary gross energy in the saltbush treatment, and 0·700 and 0·707 in the salt and control treatments respectively. Metabolizable energy (ME) was proportionately 0·795, 0·786 and 0·815 of digested energy, and heat production was 1·135, 1·043 and 0·867 of ME in the saltbush, salt and control treatments, respectively. The calculated values for digestible energy, ME, and net energy for maintenance on the saltbush diet were 5·02, 3·77 and 0·54 MJ/kg dry matter.

It is suggested that the low energetic utilization of saltbush is related to its low digestibility and the associated increase in energy expenditure, which are apparently related to mineral metabolism in the rumen. To maintain sheep on saltbush diets efforts should be made to lower the mineral content of this shrub.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 451 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barash, H. and Akov, S. 1987. Improved Niradiochemical assay of free fatty acids in plasma. Clinical Chemistry 33: 176–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. 1957. Microdiffuswn Analysis and Volumetric Error. 4th ed. Crosby, Lockwood and Son, London.Google Scholar
Croom, W. J., Harvey, R. W., Amaral, D. M. and Spears, J. W. 1985 Growth and metabolic parameters ln steers fed high levels of sodium chloride and limestone. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65: 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forti, M. 1986. Salt tolerance and halophytic plants in Israel. Reclamation and Revegetation Research 5: 83–96.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, No. 379.Google Scholar
Hassan, N. I. and Abdel-aziz, H. M. 1979. Effect of barley supplementation on the nutritive value of saltbush (Atriplex nummularia). World Review of Animal Production 15: (4), 47–55.Google Scholar
Hemsley, J. A., Hogan, J. P. and Weston, R. H. 1975. Effect of high intake of sodium chloride on the utilization of a protein concentrate by sheep. II. Digestion and absorption of organic matter and electrolytes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, F. D. DeB. 1985. Thoughts on roughage digestion by ruminants. Rowett Research Institute Annual Report, Vol. 40, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
Isaacson, H. R., Hinds, F. C., Bryant, M. P. and Owens, F. N. 1975. Efficiency of energy utilization by mixed rumen bacteria in continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 1645–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, H. M., Kromann, R. P. and Ray, E. E. 1971. Energy retention in lambs as influenced by various levels of sodium and potassium in the rations. Journal of Animal Science 33: 872–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgenson, C. B. 1977. Nutrition. In Animal Physiology. 3rd ed (ed. Gordom, M. S.), pp. 16–56. McMillan, New York.Google Scholar
McBride, B. W. and Milligan, L. P. 1985. Influence of feed intake and starvation on the magnitude of Na1, K1-ATPase (EC 3.6.1.3)-dependent respiration in duodenal mucosa of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 53: 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. A. 1972. On the calculation of heat production from open-circuit calorimetric measurements. British Journal of Nutrition 27: 597–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McRae, J. C. and Lobley, G. E. 1982. Some factors which influence thermal energy losses during the metabolism of ruminants. Livestock Production Science 9: 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, P. W., Flatt, W. P. and Tyrrell, H. F. 1972. Net energy value of feeds for lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 945–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, G. and Jones, D. I. H. 1974. The effect of sodium chloride supplementation of sodium adequate hay on digestion, production and mineral nutrition in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, D., Danon, A., Aronson, J. A. and Benjamin, R. W. 1985. Developing the seawater agriculture concept. Plant and Soil 89: 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpler, W. V. and Johnson, D. E. 1987. The effect of high cation levels in diet with and without ionophores on in vivo methanogenesis in steers. In Energy Metabolism in Farm Animals (ed. Moe, P. W., Tyrrell, H. F. and Reynolds, P. J.), pp. 58–61. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa.Google Scholar
Summers, M., McBride, B. W. and Milligan, L. P. 1988. Components of basal energy expenditure. In Aspects of Digestive Physiology in Ruminants (ed. Dobson, A. and Dobson, M. J.), pp. 287–298. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Tagari, H. 1969. Comparison of the efficiency of proteins contained in lucerne hay and soya-bean meal for sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 23: 455–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. J., Potter, B. J. and Jones, G. B. 1971. Modification of carcase characteristics in sheep maintained on a saline water regime. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 11: 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1983. Energetics of maintenance and growth. In Mammalian Thermogenesis (ed. Girardier, L. and Stock, M. J.), pp. 178–207. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H., Hogan, J. P. and Hemsley, J. A. 1970. Some aspects of digestion of Atriplex numularia (saltbush) by sheep. Proceeding of Australian Society of Animal Production 8: 517–521.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D. 1966a. The value of Atriplex (saltbush) and Kochia (bluebush) species as food for sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 17: 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. D. 1966b. The intake and excretion of sodium by sheep fed on species of Atriplex (saltbush) and Kochia (bluebush). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 17: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar