Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:23:19.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of feeding supplements in the autumn on the reproductive performance of grazing ewes 2. Feeding supplements in relation to sward height

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
J. R. Jones
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Bronydd Mawr Research Centre, Trecastle, Brecon, Powys LD3 8RD
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
Get access

Abstract

The effects of feeding supplements in relation to sward height in the autumn on the reproductive performance of ewes grazing predominantly perennial ryegrass swards were studied in four experiments with three genotypes. Treatments in which either no supplements were given or supplements were offered according to the height of the sward were compared when ewes were grazed on swards which were managed to decline in height from > 5 cm to 2·5 cm either before or after mating. At a sward height of < 3·5 cm, 400 g ground and pelleted barley was offered per head per day; at < 3·0 cm, 700 g was offered; and, at < 2·5 cm, hay was offered in addition to the barley. Responses to these treatments were compared with that of a treatment in which a sward was maintained at > 5 cm. Sward heights were controlled by varying stocking rate. In experiment 1, with 305 Scottish Blackface ewes, supplementation was not necessary until after the start of the mating period. In experiment 2, with 200 Brecknock Cheviot ewes, the supplementation protocol was examined on swards declining in height either before or after a synchronized mating. Experiment 3 repeated experiment 2 with 200 Beulah Speckled-face ewes and experiment 4 repeated only the pre-mating phase of experiment 3 with 195 Beulah Speckled-face ewes.

In experiment 1, ovulation, ova loss and potential lambing rates were determined from the number of corpora lutea and viable embryos at slaughter at 8 to 10 weeks after the start of mating in 103 ewes and lambing rate was determined from the number of lambs at lambing in the remaining 202 ewes. In experiments 2, 3 and 4, ovulation, ova loss and potential lambing rates were determined from the number of corpora lutea and viable embryos at slaughter at return to service or at 4 weeks after a synchronized first mating.

Grazing a sward declining in height below 3·5 cm in the pre-mating period significantly reduced ewe live weight, body condition and reproductive performance, particularly in the relatively prolific Beulah Speckled-face breed, compared with grazing a sward maintained at > 5 cm. Supplementation at the levels offered overcame some of the effects of the lower sward height treatment in the pre-mating period but did not compensate fully. Grazing a sward declining in height below 3·5 cm in the post-mating period, although reducing ewe live weight and body condition, had little effect on reproductive performance, compared with that achieved on a sward maintained above 4 cm. Supplementation at the levels offered at the lower sward height during the post-mating period produced no increase in overall reproductive performance and had a negative effect on some reproductive parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Hill Farming Research Organisation biennial report, 1984–85, pp. 2930. Penicuik, HFRO.Google Scholar
Bircham, J. S. 1981. Herbage growth and utilisation under continuous management. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Smith, W. F. and Gunn, R. G. 1976. Effects of post-mating environmental stress or administration of ACTH on early embryonic loss in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87: 133136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Maxwell, T. J., Sim, D. A., Jones, J. R. and James, M. E. 1991. The effect of level of nutrition prior to mating on the reproductive performance of ewes of two Welsh breeds in different levels of body condition. Animal Production 52: 157163.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Milne, J. A., Senior, A. J. and Sibbald, A. M. 1992. The effect of feeding supplements in the autumn on the reproductive performance of grazing ewes. 1. Feeding fixed amounts of supplement before and during mating. Animal Production 54: 243248.Google Scholar
McKelvey, W. A. C. and Robinson, J. J. 1986. Embryo survival and growth in the ewe — recent studies on the effects of nutrition and on novel techniques for the recovery and transfer of embryos. Annual report of studies in animal nutrition and allied sciences, Rowett Research Institute, vol. 47, pp. 925.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. J. 1986. Systems studies in upland sheep production: some implications for management and research. Hill Farming Research Organisation biennial 1984–85, pp. 155163. Penicuik, HFRO.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Sibbald, A. M., Lamb, C. S., McCormack, H. A., Mayes, R. W. and Lees, J. A. 1986. The herbage intake of ewes grazing perennial ryegrass swards and when given supplements during lactation and in the autumn. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.), occasional symposium, British Society, no. 19, pp. 124128.Google Scholar
Parr, R. A., Davis, I. F., Fairclough, R. J. and Miles, M. A. 1987. Overfeeding during early pregnancy reduces peripheral progesterone concentration and pregnancy rate in sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 80: 317320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. J. 1990. Nutrition over the winter period—the breeding female. In New developments in sheep production (ed Slade, C. F. R. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 14, pp. 5569.Google Scholar