Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T21:19:06.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sward height on beef cow performance and on the relationship between calf milk and herbage intakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. A. Wright  and
A. J. F. Russel
I. A. Wright
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Get access

Abstract

Groups of 12 spring-calving cows and their calves were allocated to each of three continuous grazing treatments: cows and calves grazed a 4- to 5-cm sward (LI), cows grazed a 4- to 5-cm sward and their calves grazed an 8- to 10-cm sward (Lh) and cows and calves grazed an 8- to 10-cm sward (Hh). In each case cows and calves grazed separately. Sward height had a large effect on both cow and calf performance and intake. The short swards reduced cow herbage intake proportionately by 0·2 compared with that of the taller sward. Cow live-weight gains were −0·60, −0·59 and 0·42 (s.e.d. 0·103) kg/day on treatments LI, Lh and Hh respectively while calf live-weight gains were 0·80, 0·95 and 1·14 (s.e.d. 0·040) kg/day. Calf milk intakes were 7·05, 5·78 and 9·34 (s.e.d. 0·508) kg/day respectively while daily herbage intakes were 17·2, 22·0 and 19·8 (s.e.d. 1·35) g organic matter per kg live weight for treatments LI, Lh and Hh. There was a negative association between calf herbage and milk organic matter intakes in the treatments where the calves had access to a more generous sward height (treatments Lh and Hh), the regression coefficient being −0·89 (s.e. 0·381), indicating the calves' ability to increase herbage intake in response to a reduction in milk intake. On the LI treatment there was no significant relationship between milk and herbage intakes. The ability of grazing suckled calves to compensate for a reduction in milk intake is thus dependent on sward conditions, and may also depend on herbage digestibility. The increase in herbage intake cannot however compensate fully for a restriction in milk supply.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 363 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, R. D. and Barker, J. M. 1978. Milk-fed calves. 4. The effect of herbage allowance and milk intake upon herbage intake and performance of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Le Du, Y. L. P. and Alvarez, F. 1981. The herbage intake and performance of set-stocked suckler cows and calves. Grass and Forage Science 36: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Le Du, Y. L. P. and Barker, J. M. 1976. Milk-fed calves. 1. The effect of milk intake upon herbage intake and performance of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Biennial Report, The Hill Farming Research Organisation, 1984–85, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Grant, S. A. 1981. Sward components. In Sward Measurement Handbook (ed. Hodgson, J., Baker, R. D., Davies, A., Laidlaw, A. S. and Leaver, J. D.), pp. 71–92. British Grassland Society, Hurley.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971. The development of solid food intake in calves. 5. The relationship between liquid and solid food intake. Animal Production 13: 593–597.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Whitelaw, A. and MacDonald, A. J. 1980. The influence of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of spring-calving suckler cows and their calves. Animal Production 30: 315–325.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Rodrigues Capriles, J. M. and Fenlon, J. S. 1977. The influence of sward characteristics on the herbage intake of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89: 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. T. C. and Elliott, R. C. 1972. Dietary energy intake and utilization by young Friesland calves. 2. Digestibility and metabolizable energy contents of whole milk and spray-dried skim milk powder, and energy retentions of calves given these foods. Rhodesian Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 125–133.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1984. GENSTAT V, Mark 4.04B. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Le Du, Y. L. P., and Baker, R. D. 1979. Milk-fed calves. 5. The effect of change in milk intake upon the herbage intake and performance of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 443–447.Google Scholar
Le Du, Y. L. P., MacDonald, A. J. and Peart, J. N. 1979. Comparison of two techniques for estimating the milk production of suckler cows. Livestock Production Science 6: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Rev. ed. Bulletin, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, No. 6.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Peart, J. N., Eadie, J., MacDonald, A. J. and White, I. R. 1979. The effect of energy intake during late pregnancy on the production from two genotypes of suckler cow. Animal Production 28: 309–327.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Wright, I. A., Hodgson, J. and Hunter, E. A. 1986. Factors affecting production from grazing beef cows and calves. In Hill Land Symposium, Galway, 1984 (ed. O'Toole, M. A.), pp. 255–269. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. and Iismaa, O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59: 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1986. The effect of winter food level on compensatory growth of weaned, suckled calves grazed at two sward heights. Animal Production 43: 211–223.Google Scholar