Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T14:16:32.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of food intake in gestation on sows lactating for 14 days

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. Walker
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, BT26 6DP
Get access

Abstract

Ninety-two gilts in replicates of four littermates were mated at puberty at a mean live weight and age of 95 kg and 191 days respectively. The littermates were allocated at random to one of four food allowances (kg/day) during four successive gestations: (A) 1·5, (B) 2·0 in parity 1 followed by 1·5 in subsequent parities, (C) 20 and (D) 2·5. A diet calculated to contain 12·7 MJ digestible energy per kg was fed throughout gestation, the 2-week lactation and from weaning to conception.

The numbers of sows which conceived at parity 5 when the experiment terminated were 10, 12, 13 and 16 for treatments A to D respectively. Sow live weight at conception differed significantly (P < 0·01) from parity 2 onwards: the maximum live weights of sows on treatments A and B did not exceed 130 to 135 kg, but the live weights of sows on treatment D continued to increase to reach 195 kg at the end of the experiment. The in vivo skin plus subcutaneous fat thickness at the P2 location differed significantly (P < 0·001) between treatments from parity 2 onwards, decreasing by 3 mm in treatment A and increasing by 6 mm in treatment D from the start of the experiment to conception at parity 4. The interval from weaning to conception was significantly (P < 0·05) lower in treatment B in parity 2. This was the only significant effect and was contrary to the tendency for the interval to increase as the food allowance in gestation was decreased. The numbers of pigs born alive, stillborn or weaned (including fostered pigs) were not significantly affected by treatment. Birth weight and post-natal growth rates were significantly (P < 0·05) increased after parity 1 as gestation food allowance increased, with the exception of the post-natal growth rate in parity 3. Overall birth weight was increased by 018 kg per pig and weaning weight by 0·93 kg per pig on treatment D compared with treatment A.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 25 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Aumaitre, A., Dagorn, J., Legault, C. and Le Denmat, M. 1976. Influence of farm management and breed type on sows conception-weaning interval and productivity in France. Livesl. Prod. Sci. 3: 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. H. 1982. The gilt for breeding and for meat. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 211–224. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. 1971. Recent advances in sow nutrition and their application in practice. ADAS Q. Rev. 1: 30–38.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., Bannerman, Mary, Bathhurst, E. v. J., Bracewell, A. G., Cunningham, J. M. M., Dodsworth, T. L., Dodds, P. A., Forbes, T. J. and Laird, R. 1969. The effect of level of feed intake in pregnancy and in lactation upon the productivity of sows. Anim. Prod. 11: 225–241.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H., MacPherson, R. M. and Lodge, G. A. 1968. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. III. Body composition. Anim. Prod. 10:149–156.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H. 1981. Factors influencing the weaning to oestrous interval in swine: a review. Wld Rev. Anim. Prod. 17: 15–28.Google Scholar
Frobish, L. T., Steele, N. C. and Davey, R. J. 1973. Long term effect of energy intake on reproductive performance of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 293–297.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. 1982. Factors affecting the natural attainment of puberty in the gilt. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 117–138. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1972. Quantitative aspects of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation. In Pig Production (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Elsley, F. W. H.), pp. 399–416. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Lynch, G. 1967. Ultrasonic and direct measurement of backfat thickness in bacon pigs. Ir. J. agric. Res. 6: 41–47.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1973. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 2, Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 7th ed.National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F., Elsley, F. W. H., MacPherson, R. M. and McDonald, I. 1975. The response of lactating sows and their litters to different dietary energy allowances. 2. Weight changes and carcass composition of sows. Anim. Prod. 20: 257–265.Google Scholar
Pattison, H. D. 1980. Patterns of sow culling. Pig News Inf. 1: 215–218.Google Scholar
Te Brake, J. H. A. 1978. An assessment of the most profitable length of lactation for producing piglets of 20 kg body weight. Livest. Prod. Sci. 5: 81–94.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F. and Van spaendonck, R. 1973. Factorial synthesis of the energy requirement of pregnant sows. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernahr. Futtermittelk. 31: 1–21.Google Scholar
Walker, N., Watt, D., MacLeod, A. S., Johnson, C. L., Boaz, T. G. and Calder, A. F. C. 1979. The effect of weaning at 10,25 or 40 days on the reproductive performance of sows from the first to the fifth parity. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Franklin, M. F. and Pearce, B. S. 1980. Fat changes in breeding sows. Anim. Prod. 31: 183–190.Google Scholar