Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T07:53:26.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of variations in energy and protein intake on digestibility, nitrogen balance and carcass composition in British Friesian castrate male cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. W. Griffiths
T. W. Griffiths
Affiliation:
An Foras Talúntais, Dunsinea, Castleknock, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-seven castrate male cattle were used in two nutritional balance and slaughter experiments to measure the effects of increasing levels of dietary protein (9 to 15% in the dry matter) at two levels of feeding (approximately 16 and 22 MJ metabolizable energy (ME)/100 kg live weight (LW) per day) on digestibility, nitrogen (N) balance and carcass growth and composition over the LW range 130 to 390 kg.

The higher level of feeding increased LW gain and carcass gain (CG) but higher protein intake increased LW gain and CG only at the higher feeding level as a result of its favourable effect on digestibility. N balance tended to overestimate carcass N retention at higher levels of protein intake.

The higher level of feeding increased the separable fat and total fat in the carcass. Increased protein intake had no effect on the lean meat content but increased the percentage protein in the edible portion of the carcass. LW gain, CG and carcass energy deposition were related to ME intake only but N balance and carcass protein gain were related to both ME and digestible crude protein intake.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , June 1978 , pp. 233 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 3, Pigs. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. P. and Ørskov, E. R. 1970a. The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. I. The influence of protein concentration and feeding level on rate of gain in body weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75: 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R. P. and Ørskov, E. R. 1970b. The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. II. The effect of dietary protein concentration, feeding level and sex on body composition at two live weights. J. agric. Set, Camb., 75: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. and Balch, C. C. 1973. Relative retentions of the nitrogen of urea and groundnut in iso-energetic diets for growing heifers. Br. J. Nutr. 29: 457–466.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1971. Relative efficiencies of farm animals in using crops and by-products in production of foods. Proc. Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., pp. 31–39. American Dairy Science Ass., St Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Rook, J. A. F. 1953. The heat of combustion of the tissues of cattle in relation to their chemical composition. Br. J. Nutr. 7: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. and Wainman, F. W. 1964. The utilisation of the energy of different rations by sheep and cattle for maintenance and for fattening. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63:113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boaz, T. G., Kirk, G. and Johnson, C. L. 1974. The effect of certain dietary regimes on growth pattern and performance of young Friesian bulls fattened for beef. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, H. B., Preston, T. R., McDonald, I., MacLeod, N. A. and Philip, E. B. 1965. Intensive beef production. 4. The effect on nitrogen retention of all-concentrate diets containing different levels offish meal. Anim. Prod. 7: 19–25.Google Scholar
Chestnutt, D. M. B., Marsh, R., Wilson, J. G., Stewart, T. A., McCullough, T. A. and McCallion, T. 1975. Effects of breed of cattle on energy requirements for growth. Anim. Prod. 21: 109–119.Google Scholar
Cooke, R., Lodge, G. A. and Lewis, D. 1972. Influence of energy and protein concentration in the diet on the performance of growing pigs. 1. Response to protein intake on a high-energy diet. Anim. Prod. 14: 35–46.Google Scholar
Craddock, B. F., Field, R. A. and Riley, M. L. 1974. Effect of protein and energy levels on lamb carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, P. E. and Hutton, J. B. 1976. Effects of dietary protein and energy on the growth of Friesian bull calves. II. Effects of level of feed intake and dietary protein content on body composition. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 19: 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. G., Dockerty, T. R., Johnson, R. R. and Preston, R. L. 1976. Relationship of empty body weight to carcass weight in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 566–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. and Smith, F. H. 1974. Further studies on the utilization of nitrogen in silage based diets. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 83: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. W., Spillane, T. A. and Bath, I. H. 1973. Studies on the nutritive value of silage with particular reference to the effects of energy and nitrogen supplementation in growing heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, F. J. and Conniffe, D. 1967. Studies on cattle of varying growth potential for beef production. II. Carcass composition and distribution of ‘lean meat’, fat and bone. Ir. J. agric. Res. 6: 153–170.Google Scholar
Hill, F. and O'Carroll, F. M. 1962. The chemical composition of pig carcases at pork, bacon and manufacturing weights. Ir. J. agric. Res. 1: 115–130.Google Scholar
Hutton, K. and Annison, E. F. 1972. Control of nitrogen metabolism in the ruminant. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31: 151–158.Google Scholar
Kay, M., Bowers, H. B. and McKiddie, G. 1968. The protein requirements of rapidly growing steers. Anim. Prod. 10: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M. and MacDearmid, A. 1973. A note on the effects of changing the concentration of protein in the diet offered to fattening beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 16: 205–207.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z., Neumark, H. and Amir, S. 1974. The effects of dietary energy content and level of feeding on the growth of Israeli-Friesian intact male cattle. Anim. Prod. 18: 67–73.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. No. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R., Aitken, J. N., Whitelaw, F. G., MacDearmid, A., Philip, E. B. and MacLeod, N. A. 1963. Intensive beef production. 3. Performance of Friesian steers given low-fibre diets. Anim. Prod. 5: 245–249.Google Scholar
Webster, A. F. J., Smith, J. S., Crabtree, R. M. and Mollison, G. S. 1976. Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. 2. Hereford x British Friesian steers given dried grass or barley. Anim. Prod. 23: 329–340.Google Scholar