Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T23:18:03.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forage mixtures for dairy cows: the effect on dry-matter intake and milk production of incorporating either fermented or urea-treated whole-crop wheat, brewers' grains, fodder beet or maize silage into diets based on grass silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. H. Phipps ,
J. D. Sutton  and
B. A. Jones
R. H. Phipps
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, University of Reading, Arborfield Hall Farm, Arborfield, Reading RG2 9HX
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, University of Reading, Arborfield Hall Farm, Arborfield, Reading RG2 9HX
B. A. Jones
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, University of Reading, Arborfield Hall Farm, Arborfield, Reading RG2 9HX
Get access

Abstract

One hundred and two multiparous Holstein/Friesian dairy coivs were used to examine the effect on food intake and milk production of replacing 330 g/kg dry matter (DM) of first-cut perennial ryegrass silage (GS) with either fermented (FW) or urea (40 g/kg DM) treated (UW) whole-crop wheat, brewers' grains (BG), fodder beet (FB) or maize silage (MS). A forage mixture containing GS and 750 g/kg DM of maize silage (MSH) was also offered. Dietary crude protein (CP) concentrations were equalized by offering all cows 6 kg DM per day of an appropriate concentrate supplement. DM intake and milk yield of cows offered GS (15·3, 23·0 kg/day) were increased (F < 0·01) by the inclusion of BG (16·3, 26·7 kg/day), FB (17·6, 25·9 kg/day), MS (16·6, 26·4 kg/day) and MSH (18·5, 27·6 kg/day). BG, FB and MS all produced similar increases in milk yield. Although the inclusion of FW and UW increased (F < 0·05) DM intake, milk yield was not significantly affected. The differences between the highest and lowest milk fat concentration, produced by FB (42·9 g/kg) and BG (40·1 g/kg) respectively, and the highest and lowest milk protein concentration produced by FB (32·1 g/kg) and GS (29·9 g/kg) respectively, were statistically significant (F < 0·001). Milk fat and protein yields of cows offered GS (0·97, 0·71 kg/day) were increased (F < 0·01) by BG (1·07, 0·82 kg/day), FB (1·11, 0·83 kg/day), MS (1·11, 0·83 kg/day) and MSH (1·12, 0·88 kg/day). Intermediate values were recorded for FW (1·01, 0·72 kg/day) or UW (1·00, 0·73 kg/day). Results show that farmers should consider replacing a major part of the grass silage component with an alternative forage or forage substitute.

Keywords

dairy cowsmilk productionforageurea
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 491 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, A. H. and Reeve, A. 1992. Nutritional evaluation of whole crop wheat. In Whole-crop cereals. 2nd ed. (ed. Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M.), pp. 21–37. Chalcombe Publications, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Adesogan, A. T., Givens, D. I. and Owen, E. 1995. A comparison between in vitro digestibility, in situ degradability and a gas production technique for predicting the in vivo digestibility of whole crop wheat. Animal Production 60: 542 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Fisher, G. E. J., Sabri, M. S. and Roberts, D. J. 1994. Effect of feeding fodder beet and concentrates with different protein contents on dairy cows offered silage ad libitum. Grass and Forage Science 49: 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. and Leaver, J. D. 1992. Effect of protein supplementation on the digestibility of urea-treated whole crop wheat and on milk production by dairy cows. Animal Production 54: 449–450 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Hill, J. and Leaver, J. D. 1993. The intake, digestibility and rate of passage of whole crop wheat and grass silage by growing heifers. Animal Production 56: 443 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Kleinhout, A. 1990. The use of fodder beet as a whole crop: experience in Denmark. In Meat and milk from forage crops (ed. Pollott, G. E.), pp. 157–172. British Grassland Society, occasional symposium no. 24.Google Scholar
Kristensen, V. F. 1992. The production and feeding of whole crop cereals and legumes in Denmark. In Whole-crop cereals. 2nd ed. (ed. Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M.), pp. 21–37. Chalcombe Publications, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. and Hill, J. 1992. Feeding cattle on whole-crop cereals. In Whole-crop cereals. 2nd ed. (ed. Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M.), pp. 59–72. Chalcombe Publications, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Miller, T. B., El Hag, G. A. and Pratt, G. 1970. Evaluation of whisky by-products. 3. Effects of calcium supplements on the digestibility and intake of ruminant diets containing malt distillers grains. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 21: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. Feed composition. UK tables of feed composition and nutritive value for ruminants. Chalcombe, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1993. Prediction of the energy value of compound feeding stuffs for farm animals. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Publications, London.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F. and Phipps, R. H. 1975. The energy to grow maize. New Scientist 66: 394–396.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Weller, R. F., Elliott, D. and Sutton, J. D. 1988. The effect of level and type of concentrate and type of conserved forage dry matter intake and milk production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Weller, R.F. and Rook, A. J. 1992a. Forage mixtures for dairy cows: the effect on dry matter intake and milk production of incorporating different proportions of maize silage into diets based on grass silage of differing energy value. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118: 379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Weller, R. F. and Siviter, J. W. 1992b. Whole-crop cereals for dairy cows. In Whole-crop cereals. 2nd ed. (ed. Stark, B. A. and Wilkinson, J. M.), pp. 51–57. Chalcombe Publications, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. J. 1987. The effect of feeding fodder beet to dairy cows offered silage ad libitum. Grass and Forage Science 42: 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. J. and Martindale, J. F. 1990. Fodder beet: a review of research findings in relation to animal production. In Meat and milk from forage crops (ed. Pollot, G. E.), British Grassland Society occasional symposium no. 24.Google Scholar
Statistics Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. SAS users guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Abdalla, A. L., Phipps, R. H., Cammell, S. B. and Humphries, D. J. 1995. Digestibility and nitrogen balance in dairy cows given diets of grass silage and whole crop wheat. Animal Science 60: 510 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Weller, R. F. and Phipps, R. H. 1985. Milk production from grass and maize silages. Animal Production 40: 560–561 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Weller, R. F. and Phipps, R. H. 1986. The effect of silage preference on the performance of dairy cows. Animal Production 42: 435 (abstr.).Google Scholar