Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T14:56:09.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotype by environment interactions in lamb weight and carcass composition traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

N. Maniatis  and
G. E. Pollott
Get access

Abstract

The systematic use of the same genotype in several different environments provides information that can be used to estimate genotype by environment interaction (G ✕ E) variances and parameters. Data from the UK Suffolk Sire Referencing Scheme Ltd were used to investigate a range of sire and dam by environment interactions in lamb weight (at 8 weeks and scanning) and body composition traits (muscle and fat depth). These interactions were calculated in a DFREML mixed model containing direct additive, maternal additive, maternal environmental random variance components and the covariance between direct and maternal additive effects. Sire interactions with year, flock and flock-year and dam effects within and between litters were investigated. The addition of all G ✕ E (co)variance components resulted in an improved fit of the model for all traits. Sire interactions accounted for between 2 and 3% of the phenotypic variance in all traits, usually at the expense of both additive effects. Maternal litter environmental variance components ranged from 10% (fat depth and muscle depth) to 20% (8-week weight) of phenotypic variance. Most of this variation was found in the residual component of variance when the term was omitted from the model. When fitting sire G✕ E components in a model the covariance between direct and maternal additive genetic effects, as a proportion of phenotypic variance, was reduced to a low level (from –0·36 to –0·08 for 8-week weight). Genotype by environment interactions form a significant source of variation in lamb growth and composition traits and reduce the high negative correlation between additive effects found previously in these traits.

Keywords

genetic parametersgenotype environment interactionlamb productionmaternal effects
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , August 2002 , pp. 3 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brotherstone, S. and Hill, W. G. 1986. Heterogeneity of variance amongst herds for milk production. Animal Production 42: 297–303.Google Scholar
Canavesi, F., Schaeffer, L. R., Burnside, E. B., Jansen, G. B. and Rozzi, P. 1995a. Sire by herd interaction effect when variances across herds are heterogeneous. 1. Expected genetic progress. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 112: 95–106.Google Scholar
Canavesi, F., Schaeffer, L. R., Burnside, E. B., Jansen, G. B. and Rozzi, P. 1995b. Sire by herd interaction effect when variances across herds are heterogeneous. 2. Within herd variance component estimates. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 112: 107–116.Google Scholar
Cundiff, L. V. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. VIII. Comparative aspects of maternal effects. Journal of Animal Science 35: 1335–1337.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. 1962. Implications in genetic-environmental interaction in animal breeding. Animal Production 4: 47–63.Google Scholar
Dimov, G., Albuquerque, L. G., Keown, J. F., Vanvleck, L. D. and Norman, H. D. 1995. Variance of interaction effects of sire and herd for yield traits of Holsteins in California, New York, and Pennsylvania with an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 939–946.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1952. The problem of environment and selection. American Nature 86: 293–298.Google Scholar
Graser, H.-U., Smith, S. P. and Tier, B. 1987. A derivative-free approach for estimating variance components in animal models by Restricted Maximum Likelihood. Journal of Animal Science 64: 1362–1370.Google Scholar
Hagger, C. 1998. Litter, permanent environmental, ramflock, and genetic effects on early weight gain of lambs. Journal of Animal Science 76: 452–457.Google Scholar
Hagger, C. and Schneeberger, M. 1995. Influences of amount of pedigree information on computing time and of model assumptions on restricted maximum likelihood estimates of population parameters in Swiss Black-Brown Mountain sheep. Journal of Animal Science 73: 2213–2219.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1984. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Lee, C. and Pollak, E. J. 1997a. Influence of sire misidentification on sire ✕ year interaction variance and direct-maternal genetic covariance for weaning weight in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 75: 2858–2863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C. and Pollak, E. J. 1997b. Relationship between sire ✕ year interactions and direct maternal genetic correlation for weaning weight of Simmental cattle. Journal of Animal Science 75: 68–75.Google Scholar
Maniatis, N. and Pollott, G. E. 2002a. Maternal effects on weight and ultrasonically measured traits of lambs in a closed Suffolk flock. Small Ruminant Research In press.Google Scholar
Maniatis, N. and Pollott, G. E. 2002b. Nucear, cytoplasmic and environmental effects on growth traits in Suffolk lambs from a sire referencing scheme. Journal of Animal Science 80: 57–67.Google Scholar
Maniatis, N. and Pollott, G. E. 2002c. The impact of data structure on estimates of direct and maternal influences on early growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science In press.Google Scholar
Maria, G. A., Boldman, L. D. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1993. Estimates of variances due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Romanov sheep. Journal of Animal Science 71: 845–849.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1987. Estimates of variances due to sire ✕ herd interactions and environmental covariances between paternal half-sibs for first lactation dairy production. Livestock Production Science 17: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. 1989. Restricted maximum likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative free algorithm. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 21: 317–340.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1992. Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 31: 179–204.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters for weaning weight of beef cattle accounting for direct maternal environmental covariances. Livestock Production Science 52: 187–199.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1998. DFREML. Version 3a, user notes. Animal Breeding and Genetics Unit., University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Misztal, I. 1990. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components in animal model using sparse matrix inversion and a supercomputer. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 163–172.Google Scholar
Näsholm, A. and Danell, Ö. 1996. Genetic relationships of lamb weight, maternal ability, and mature ewe weight in Swedish Finewool sheep. Journal of Animal Science 74: 329–339.Google Scholar
Notter, D. R., Tier, B. and Meyer, K. 1992. Sire ✕ herd interactions for weaning weight in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70: 2359–2365.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., O’Connor, L. K. and Edwards, J. 1960. Progeny testing bulls at different management levels. Animal Production 2: 141–152.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. L. 1996a. Estimation and interpretation of direct and maternal genetic parameters for weights of Australian Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 45: 1–11.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. L. 1996b. Models which might explain negative correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects. Livestock Production Science 45: 111–122.Google Scholar
Saatci, M., Ap Dewi, I. and Ulutas, Z. 1999. Variance components due to direct and maternal effects and estimation of breeding values for 12-week weight of Welsh Mountain lambs. Animal Science 69: 345–352.Google Scholar
Smith, S. P. and Graser, H. U. 1986. Estimating variance components in a class of mixed models by restricted maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 1156–1165.Google Scholar
Tosh, J. J. and Kemp, R. A. 1994. Estimation of variance components for lamb weights in 3 sheep populations. Journal of Animal Science 72: 1184–1190.Google Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D. 1963. Genotype and environment in sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 46: 983–987.Google Scholar
Wald, A. 1943. Tests of statistical hypothesis concerning several parameters when the number of variables is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 54: 426–482.Google Scholar
Willham, R. L. 1980. Problems in estimating maternal effects. Livestock Production Science 7: 405–418.Google Scholar