Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T09:33:13.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig 2. Effects of rearing method and feeding level on growth and development to 75 kg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Campbell  and
A. C. Dunkin
R. G. Campbell
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
A. C. Dunkin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

1. Fifty-seven piglets were used to study the effects of rearing pigs on the sow or artificially on a low or high level of feeding between 1·8 and 6·5 kg live weight and either a low or high level of feeding between 6·5 and 20 kg live weight on growth and development to 75 kg live weight.

2. The artificially reared pigs fed at the higher level grew more rapidly (P < 0·05) and were fatter (P < 0·05) at 6·5 kg live weight than their more restrictedly fed counterparts. The pigs reared on the sow grew at the same rate as the artificially reared pigs fed at the low level but at 6·5 kg live weight were as fat as the artificially reared pigs fed at the higher level.

3. Between 6·5 and 20 kg live weight the artificially reared pigs previously fed at the lower level grew more rapidly (P < 0·05) than their more liberally fed counterparts which in turn, grew at a faster rate (P < 0·05) than pigs previously reared on the sow. However, nutrition prior to 6·5 kg live weight had no influence on performance or body composition subsequent to 20 kg live weight.

4. Raising the level of feeding between 6·5 and 20 kg live weight increased growth rate (P < 0·05) and body fat content at the latter weight (P < 0·05). However, subsequent to 20 kg live weight, the pigs previously fed at the lower level exhibited more rapid and efficient growth (P < 0·05) and at 75 kg live weight were leaner (P < 0·05) than those fed more generously between 6·5 and 20 kg.

5. At 6·5 kg live weight the pigs reared on the sow contained less deoxyribonucleic acid (P < 0·05) in the m. adductor than pigs from either of the two artificially reared groups. Muscle deoxyribonucleic acid at 20 and 75 kg live weight was unaffected by nutrition before 6·5 kg live weight or level of feeding between 6·5 and 20 kg live weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 425 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1982. The effects of birth weight and level of feeding in early life on growth and development of muscle and adipose tissue in the young pig. Anim. Prod. 35: 185–192.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. and Dunkin, A. C. 1983. The influence of nutrition in early life on growth and development of the pig. 1. Effects of protein nutrition prior and subsequent to 6–5 kg on growth and development to 45 kg. Anim. Prod. 36: 415–423.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. 1963. Studies of growth and development in the young pig. Part II. A comparison of the performance to 200 lb of pigs reared along different growth curves to 56 days of age. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61: 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. 1971. Nutrition and lactation in the sow. In Lactation (ed. Falconer, I. R.), pp. 393–411. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Gilbreath, R. L. and Trout, J. R. 1973. Effects of early postnatal dietary protein restriction and repletion on porcine muscle growth and composition. J. Nutr. 103: 1637–1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henken, H., Freese, H. H. and Lenkeit, W. 1963. The metabolism of growing pigs from birth onwards. I. Nitrogen metabolism to 56 days in suckling piglets and piglets fed milk substitutes. Z. Tierphysiol. Tiererndhr. Futtermittelk. 18: 69–75.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Sarkar, N. K. and Friend, D. W. 1977. Hyperplasic and hypertrophic growth in brain, liver and muscle of undernourished suckled pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 45: 1346–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. J., Ezekwe, M., Herbein, J. H., Sherritt, G. W., Gobble, J. L. and Ziegler, J. H. 1974. Effects of neonatal nutritional experiences on growth and development of the pig. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 521–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, H. E. 1964. Effects in bacon pigs of differing levels of nutrition to 20 kg body weight Anim. Prod. 6: 301–308.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. W. 1969. The cellular response of porcine skeletal muscle to prenatal and neonatal nutritional stress. Growth. 33: 231–240.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, I. H. 1976. Nutrition of the young pig in relation to body composition. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Melbourne.Google Scholar