Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T13:21:01.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of social behaviour on experimental design in animal husbandry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1959

Glenorchy McBride
Glenorchy McBride
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

Evidence of an effect of the peck order in poultry on the variation in productive characters under floor conditions is used as the basis of a discussion on the design of animal experiments.

Since these competitive effects increase the variation between animals penned together, the usual tests for the presence of pen effects between replicate pens are unsuitable. Replicates should be used in all experiments when treatments are allocated to pens of animals to provide an adequate measure of the experimental error.

Considerations of social behaviour are likely to be relevant in many types of animal experiments, both husbandry and breeding.

It is, however, emphasised that the amount of information available on such an important question is completely inadequate and that behaviour studies should be incorporated into all types of animal experiments to obtain such information.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1959 , pp. 81 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blyth, J. S., 1952. The correlation between egg number and egg weight in the fowl: an investigation of its inconstancy. Poult. Sci., 31: 254.Google Scholar
Dudley, F., & Read, D., 1949. The design of experiments in egg production of poultry. Harper Adams Util. Poult. J., 34: 65.Google Scholar
Fredeen, H. R., & Jonsson, P., 1957. Genetic variance and covariance in Danish Landrace swine as evaluated under a system of individual feeding of progeny test groups. Z. Tierz. ZuchtBiol., 70: 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, R., 1952. Experimental errors in laying experiments. J. agric. Sci., 42: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, P., 1955. Fortsatte statistiske undersagelser over grisenes daglige tilvaekst samt foderforbruget pr. kg tilvaekst. Tidsskr. Landakon., 1955 (11/12): 405.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Henry, C., & Presto, J., 1952. The feeding space requirements of laying birds receiving a mash, grain, and supplementary pellet ration. Poult. Sci., 31: 290.Google Scholar
Lerner, I., 1950. Population Genetics and Animal Improvement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBride, G., 1958. The influence of the environment upon poultry productivity. II. The effect of peck order on productivity. Aust. J. Sci. (in the press).Google Scholar
Merritt, E., Aitken, J., & Stewart, I., 1957. Experimental errors in egg production experiments. Canad. J. Anim. Sci., 37: 143.Google Scholar
Titus, H., 1953. Variation in egg production and hatchability. Poult. Sci., 32: 593.Google Scholar