Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T22:22:44.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mixed grazing of cattle and sheep versus cattle only in an intensive grassland system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. A. Dickson
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
J. Frame
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
D. P. Arnot
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
Get access

Abstract

During the period 1974-77 six blocks of a perennial ryegrass/white clover sward were each divided into two for rotational paddock-grazing and silage cutting in alternate years. For each use an annual total of 360 kg nitrogen per ha was applied. Six livestock treatments of cattle only or cattle and sheep were grazed on the blocks. The stocking rates per ha and combinations of cattle (yearling steers) and sheep (ewes nursing twin lambs) respectively were low, 7·5 + 0; medium, 10 + 0, 7·5 + 5, and 5+10; and high, 7·5 + 10 and 5 + 15.

The annual quantities of herbage organic matter accumulated (6·6 to 7·2 t/ha) and consumed (5·6 to 6·7 t/ha) did not differ markedly according to grazing treatment during an individual year, nor was there an effect on organic matter accumulation in subsequent conservation years (11·3 to 12·0 t/ha). Between-year effects were significant. As judged by persistence of sown species there was no evidence of sward deterioration over the 4 years.

Total live-weight gain per ha increased with increasing stocking rate but with a decreasing increment. The ranges were 106 to 1·42 t/ha within treatments, 102 to 1/45 t/ha within years and 0·97 to 1·8t/ha within treatments × years. Individual gains of cattle (0·67 to 0·88 kg/day) and lambs (0·20 to 0·27 kg/day), and the proportion of lambs ready for slaughter (0·53 to 0·97), were lowest at the highest stocking rate. Mixed grazing compared with cattle-only led to improved cattle gains and improved total gains per ha. The benefits of mixed grazing for a species tended to increase as the proportion of that species in the mix decreased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, D., Morley, F. H. W., Clark, K. W. and Dudzinski, M. L. 1970. The effect of grazing cattle and sheep together. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 10: 694709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. G. 1966. Grazed pasture parameters. I. Pasture dry-matter production and availability in a stocking rate and grazing management experiment with dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 67: 198210.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. and Nolan, T. 1976. Design and analysis of mixed grazing experiments. Anim. Prod. 23: 6371.Google Scholar
Conway, A. 1970. Grazing management for beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 8591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpin, S., Evans, W. M. R. and Francis, A. L. 1964. An experiment on mixed stocking of pasture. Expl Husb., No. 10, pp. 2938.Google Scholar
Dickson, G. R. 1959. The more efficient grazing of ewes and lambs. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 14: 172176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurnett, L. R. and Lawrence, N. G. 1977. Studies on mixed grazing of beef cattle and sheep. Part I. Trials at Trawsgoed 1967 to 1969. Expl Husb., No. 32, pp. 8689.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. and Bath, J. G. 1970. Performance of cattle and sheep grazed separately and together. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 10: 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, M. and Thompson, D. B. J. 1965. A comparison of methods of grazing ewes and lambs. Expl Husb., No. 12, pp. 114.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. and Sandland, R. L. 1974. The relation between animal gain and stocking rate. Derivation of the relation from the results of grazing trials. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 83: 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilkenny, J. B. 1978. Efficiency of grazing management on physical and financial efficiency. In Sheep on Lowland Grass, Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., pp. 2937. British Society of Animal Production, Reading.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. 1970. Mixed and alternate grazing. 11th Prog. Rep. exp. Husb. Fms exp. Hon. Stns N.A.A.S., pp. 5661. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Macmaster, , 1971. Faecal egg counts: modified MacMaster method. Manual of Veterinary Parsitological Laboratory Techniques, Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd, 18, p. 5.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. D. and Jarvis, R. A. 1956. The Soils of the Country around Kilmarnock. Memoirs of a Soil Survey of Great Britain/Scotland. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mott, G. O. 1960. Grazing pressure and the measurement of pasture production. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr., Reading, pp. 606611.Google Scholar
Munro, R. F., Laird, R., Frame, J. and Harkess, R. D. 1979. “Your herd and others”. Comparative figures from the Milk Production Systems Investigation for year ended 30th April 1979. Statem. MPSI Unit, W. Scotl. Agric. Coll., 205. West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr.Google Scholar
Passmore, M. 1952. Grazing sheep and cattle. J. Frms' Club (3), pp. 3944.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N. 1962. Increased production from hill pastures. Sourhope trials with cattle and sheep. Scott. Agric. 42: 147151.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. J., Bond, J., Carlson, G. E., Jackson, C. Jr, Hart, R. H. and Lindahl, I. L. 1971. Co-grazing of sheep and cattle on an orchardgrass sward. Agron. J. 63: 533536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. and Large, R. V. 1959. Sideways creep grazing for intensive lamb production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 14: 1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. J. and Black, W. J. M. 1960. Studies on Nematodirus. 20th Rep. Duke's Fund, Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Van Keuren, R. W. 1970. Symposium on pasture methods for maximum production in beef cattle: pasture methods for maximizing beef cattle production in Ohio. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 138142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar