Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T17:11:58.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on changes to feeding behaviour of growing pigs by fitting stalls to single-space feeders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. T. S. Morrow  and
N. Walker
A. T. S. Morrow
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

A two-treatment experiment was made involving 340 crossbred pigs penned in groups of 20 and offered a cereal-based, non-pelleted diet ad libitum from one single-space hopper per pen supplying both food and water. Half the feeders were fitted with stalls which protected the feeding pig from its pen mates. The average number of visits per day to the feeder was reduced from 20·1 to 11·9 (s.e. 1·58, P<0·01) by fitting the stall and the average duration of each visit was increased from 2·06 min to 4·18 min (s.e. 0·298, P < 0·02). The total time of occupation and its circadian pattern were similar for both treatments There were reductions in the incidence of enforced withdrawals (12·7 v. 3·4 (s.e. 0·75), P < 0·001) and of pigs queuing (28·6 v. 84 (s.e. 2·35), P < 0·001) with the addition of a stall which also reduced the occurrence of tail biting. Although the stall improved pig welfare the anticipated reduction in food spillage was not evident.

Keywords

feeder designfeeding behaviourpigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , August 1994 , pp. 151 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, M. R. 1986. The design of the feeding environment for the pig. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1987. Genstat 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Morrow, A. T. S. and Walker, N. 1994. Effects of number and siting of single-space feeders on performance and feeding behaviour of growing pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, B. L. and Lawrence, A. B. 1993. The effect of group size on the behaviour and performance of growing pigs using computerised single-space feeders. Pig News and Information 14: 127N–129N.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, R. M. and Heege, H. J. 1984. Individual dribble-feeding for fattening pigs. Landtechnik 39: 141–144.Google Scholar
Walker, N. 1990. Observations on single-space hopper feeders for finishing pigs. National Agricultural Centre Pig Unit Newsletter, no. 34, pp. 4–8, Royal Agricultural Society of England, Stoneleigh.Google Scholar
Walker, N. 1991. The effects on performance and behaviour of number of growing pigs per mono-place feeder. Animal Feed Science and Technology 35: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar