Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T13:42:13.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on growth and food conversion in pigs at different air temperatures and ventilation rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. R. Morrison ,
R. L. Givens  and
H. Heitman Jr
S. R. Morrison
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
R. L. Givens
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
H. Heitman Jr
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Get access

Summary

Ventilation rates of 0·14, 0·42 and 0·71 m3/min per pig (2·3, 6·9 and 11·5 air changes per hour) were compared at weight ranges from 42 to 65 kg and from 69 to 88 kg and at optimum ambient temperature and at 8°C above optimal. A total of 96 pigs was used, housed so that gases from manure decomposition were present. Growth rate and food conversion were not affected by ventilation rates, but food intake was significantly lower at the lowest ventilation rate compared with the other two rates at the hotter temperature only. The odours and gases at the lowest ventilation rate were such that attendants strongly objected to them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 249 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association. 1965. Standard Methods for the Examination of Waste and Wastewater. 12th ed.American Public Health Association, New York.Google Scholar
Curtis, S., Jensen, A. H., Simon, J. and Day, D. L. 1974. Effects of aerial ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and swine-house dust, alone and combined, on swine health and performance. In Livestock Environment, Proc. int. Livestock Environment Symp., Am. Soc. agric. Engrs, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
Doig, P. A. and Willoughby, R. A. 1971. Response of swine to atmospheric ammonia and organic dust. J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 159: 1353–1361.Google ScholarPubMed
Givens, R. L., Morrison, S. R., Bond, T. E. and Miller, C. R. 1971. Temporary facilities for some animal environmental studies. United States Department of Agriculture, ARS-42-191.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. A. M. 1963. Environmental studies in pig housing. III. Ventilation and odour intensity. Br. vet. J. 119: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitman, H. Jr, Kelly, C. F. and Bond, T. E. 1958. Ambient air temperature and weight gain in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midwest Plan Service. 1974. Structures and Environment Handbook. Midwest Plan Service, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Stombaugh, D. P., Teague, H. S. and Roller, W. L. 1969. Effects of atmospheric ammonia on the pig. J. Anim. Sci. 28: 844–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed