Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:38:13.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the behaviour of individually-penned sheep regarding their use for research purposes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Debbie Marsden
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
D. G. M. Wood-Gush
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

The behaviour of individually-penned lambs was observed and found to include many abnormal as well as normal behaviour patterns. Those with ad libitum pelleted concentrate or hay or greater environmental disturbance spent less time exhibiting abnormal behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Done-Currie, J. R., Hecker, J. F. and Wodzicka-tomaszewska, M. 1984. Behaviour of sheep transferred from pasture to an animal house. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12: 121130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. 1975. The effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls. Anim. Prod. 21: 5968.Google Scholar
Kiley-Worthington, M. 1983. The behaviour of confined calves raised for veal: are these animals distressed? Int. J. Stud. Anim. Prob. 4: 198213.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1982. Genstat V, Mark 4.04. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Mary, Emmans, G. C. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1985. The effects of nutrition and stage of maturity on the efficiency of lamb growth and carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 40: 522 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Stolba, A., Baker, N. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1983. The characterization of stereotyped behaviour in stalled sows by informational redundancy. Behaviour 87: 157182.Google Scholar