Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T15:13:45.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of separated milk for pigs: II. The effects of different amounts on performance to 90 kg live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. G. Chamberlain  and
B. C. Cooke
A. G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor
B. C. Cooke
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access

Summary

Each of seven diets containing different proportions of separated milk and barley meal, supplemented with minerals and vitamins, was given to five groups of four pigs. The ratios of barley to milk solids were such that the crude protein of the dry matter given to pigs of 20 to 40 kg live weight ranged from approximately 15 to 21%. Within each treatment, the proportion of milk was gradually adjusted so that the crude protein level was reduced by 3% over the live-weight range 40 to 91 kg. Daily energy allowances of all pigs were governed by the same scale.

The total dry matter consumed by the pigs had mean total lysine levels of from 0·52 to 1·18% (approximately 0·1% lysine between successive treatments).

Pigs on the lowest level of milk grew more slowly and had poorer feed conversion than other animals.

Percentage dissectable lean in the trimmed side was highly correlated with lysine level. Within the range studied, each 0·1% increase in lysine increased lean by 0·69% and caused decreases in fat thickness. The performance of the milk-fed pigs was compared to controls given a standard all-meal diet.

Nitrogen metabolism trials were carried out on the milk diets. Beneficial responses in terms of nitrogen retention were found up to the highest level of milk given to pigs between 16 and 90 kg live weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 125 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council 1967. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 3, Pigs. Technical Reviews and Summaries. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Hosking, Z. D. and Mitchell, K. G. 1965. The effects of different amounts of liquid skim-milk on pork pigs with particular reference to carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 7: 153–164.Google Scholar
Breirem, K. 1939. Der energieumsatz bei den Schweinen. Tierernahrung 11: 487–528.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. C., Fontenot, J. P., Vipperman, P. E., Thomas, H. R. and Graham, P. P. 1964. Chemical composition of the young pig carcass. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1022–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, A. G. and Lucas, I. A. M. 1968. The nutritive value of separated milk for pigs. I. A comparison of two diets containing separated milk with a standard all-meal diet. Anim. Prod. 10: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielanowski, J. 1967. Efficiency of energy utilization in growing pigs. Report of proceedings and invited papers, 9th International Congress of Animal Production, Edinburgh, 1966. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. 1940. Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. I. Age changes in growth and development. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 30: 276–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food. 1964. Advisory Leaflet No. 439. Feeding Separated Milk. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th ed.Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar