Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:33:47.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population study of abortion in cattle with special reference to genetic factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. V. S. Wijeratne  and
D. L. Stewart
W. V. S. Wijeratne
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey
D. L. Stewart
Affiliation:
Reading Cattle Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
Get access

Summary

The incidence of abortions over a period of eight years was studied in 107 393 progeny of 100 bulls belonging to five dairy and three beef breeds of cattle. The calving records related to the first four artificial inseminations on females with fresh or frozen semen.

The average frequency of abortion was 2·12%. Differences in rates of abortion between the breeds of sire were statistically significant although this may be confounded with the breed of dam. The highest incidence was from matings by bulls of the Channel Island breeds and the least from matings to Ayrshire bulls.

The rates of abortion increased with the number of inseminations necessary for conception.

There was a slightly higher incidence of abortions among twin births than among singles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 1971 , pp. 229 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyd, H., Bacsich, P., Young, A. and McCraken, J. A. 1969. Fertilization and embryonic survival in dairy cattle. Br. vet. J. 125: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, S., Hogan, A. G., Kempster, H. L., Ragsdale, A. C. and Trowbridge, E. A. 1926. Growth and development with special reference to domestic animals. I. Quantitative data. Bull. Mo. agrie. Exp. Stn., No. 96.Google Scholar
Davis, H. P. 1952. Dairy calf births and disposals. Bull. Neb. agric. Exp. Stn., No. 411.Google Scholar
Herman, H., Spalding, R. W., Hineman, J. H. and Bower, K. W. 1953. Reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull., 528.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, M. E. and Austwick, P. K. 1967. Epidemiological studies in bovine mycotic abortion. I. Effect of climate on incidence. Vet. Rec. 81: 273–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, H. E., Black, W. G., Wiltbank, J. N., Ulberg, L. C. and Casida, L. E. 1954. Fertilization rates and embryonic death rates in cows bred to bulls of different levels of fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 37: 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, F. B., Davis, M. E., Macrae, W. D. and Withers, F. W. 1960. Disease, wastage and husbandry in the British dairy herd. Report of a national survey in 1957–58. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Leech, F. B., Vessey, M. P. and Macrae, W. D. 1964a. Disease, wastage and husbandry in the British dairy herd, 1958–59. Animal disease surveys report No. 3. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Leech, F. B., Vessey, M. P., Macrae, W. D., Lawson, J. R., MacKinnon, D. J. and Morgan, W. J. B. 1964b. Brucellosis in the British dairy herd. Animal disease survey report No. 4. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. 1964. An abortion problem in cattle. Vth int. Cong. Anim. Reprod. Artif. Insem., 4, 102–107.Google Scholar
Moller, K., Newling, P. E., Robson, H. J., Jansen, G. J. and Meursinge, J. A. 1967. A survey of abortions and long return intervals in dairy herds in the Huntley district. N.Z. vet. J. 15: 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylrea, P. J. 1963. A suspected genetic cause of abortion in cattle. Aust. vet. J. 39: 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seath, D. M., Staples, C. H. and Neasham, E. W. 1943. A study of breeding records in dairy herds. Bull. Lo. agric. Exp. Stn., No. 370.Google Scholar
Sellers, K. C., Smith, G. F. and Wood, P. D. P. 1968. An investigation into calf mortality in the first eight weeks of life in England and Wales. Br. vet. J. 124: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. Sixth ed.Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. W. C. and Bung, G. K. 1968. Genetic evidence for a lethal mutation in Holstein-Friesian cattle. J. Hered. 59: 366–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijeratne, W. V. S. and Stewart, D. L. 1970. Stillbirths in cattle. Br. vet. J. 126: 238–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Withers, F. W. 1952. Mortality rates and disease incidence in calves in relation to feeding, management and other environmental factors. Br. vet. J. 108: 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation 1966. W.H.O. group on the standardisation of procedures for chromosome studies in abortion. Cytogenetics, 5: 361–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar