Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:35:13.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection for longevity and yield in dairy cows using transmitting abilities for type and yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. F. Veerkamp ,
W. G. Hill ,
A. W. Stott ,
S. Brotherstone  and
G. Simm
R. F. Veerkamp
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
W. G. Hill
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
A. W. Stott
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Rural Economics, Scottish Agricultural College, King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
G. Simm
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

A dynamic programming model was used to derive economic values for the goal traits milk, fat and protein yield and longevity. The economic values derived were £3.37 per % cows surviving to complete lactation four (conditional on having a milk record in the first lactation) and £-0.03, £0.60 and £4.04 per kg for milk, fat and protein yield respectively. In terms of genetic standard deviations the weight for protein, fat, milk and longevity were 1.0, 0.21, —0.25 and 0.55, respectively. Using economic values and genetic (co) variances, weights were derived for milk fat, protein and four linear type traits (chosen out of fifteen on the basis of the genetic correlation with longevity): angularity (angular), foot angle (steeper), udder depth (shallower) and teat length (shorter). Three additive indices were derived, assuming that the breeding goal was for: (i) yield only (PIN), (ii) longevity only (LIN) or (ii) yield and longevity, hence economic merit (ITEM). Selection on ITEM is expected to give a 2% higher annual rate of genetic progress compared with selection on PIN. Efficiency of using ITEM was larger than 0.97 compared with the optimum index, when the real individual economic values increased or decreased by a factor 1.5 or 2.0. Weights for ITEM were calculated assuming that predicted transmitting abilities (PTAs) from complete multivariate analysis were used as index measurements. In the practical situation that index measurements came from (i) separate univariate best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluations or (ii) two multivariate BLUP evaluations (one for type and one for yield), efficiency of ITEM (compared with the optimum index) decreased with decreasing accuracy of the PTAs and with increasing ratio between number of records for type and yield, or vice versa, but remained close to 100%. Only in the (not practical) situation where accurate PTAs for type and inaccurate information for yield were combined, did the efficiency of ITEM drop as low as 0.44, due to a change of sign for udder depth in the optimal index.

Keywords

dairy cattleeconomic valueslongevityselection index
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allaire, F. R. and Keller, D. S. 1990. Specifying dairy merit for genetic improvement. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. 14, pp. 217–220.Google Scholar
Amer, P. R. and Fox, G. C. 1992. Estimation of economic weights in genetic improvement using neoclassical production theory: an alternative to rescaling. Animal Production 54: 341–350.Google Scholar
Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1985a. Studies on replacements policies in dairy cattle. II. Optimum policy and influence of changes in production and prices. Livestock Production Science 14: 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1985b. A model to estimate the performance, revenues and costs for dairy cows under different production and price situations. Agricultural Systems 16: 157–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1991. Use of profit equations to determine relative economic value of dairy cattle herd life and production from field data. journal of Dairy Science 74: 1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, J. J., Everett, R. W. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1980. Profitability index for sires. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 1334–1341.Google Scholar
Balaine, D. S., Pearson, R. E. and Miller, R. H. 1981. Repeatability of net economic efficiency in dairy cattle and role of some economic variables as its predictors. Journal of Dairy Science 64: 96–103.Google Scholar
Boldman, K. G., Freeman, A. E., Harris, B. L. and Kuck, A. L. 1992. Prediction of sire transmitting abilities for herd life from transmitting abilities for linear type traits. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 552–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brotherstone, S. and Hill, W. G. 1991a. Dairy herd life in relation to linear type traits and production. 1. Phenotypic and genetic analyses in pedigree type classified herds. Animal Production 53: 279–287.Google Scholar
Brotherstone, S. and Hill, W. G. 1991b. Dairy herd life in relation to linear type traits and production. 2. Genetic analyses for pedigree and non-pedigree cows. Animal Production 53: 289–297.Google Scholar
Burke, B. P. and Funk, D. A. 1993. Relationship of linear type traits and herd life under different management-systems. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 2773–2782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, E. B., McClintock, A. E. and Hammond, K. 1984. Type, production and longevity in dairy cattle: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 52: 711–719.Google Scholar
Congleton, W. R. and King, L. W. 1984. Profitability of dairy cow herd life. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekkers, J. C. M. 1991. Estimation of economic values for dairy cattle breeding goals-bias due to sub optimal management policies. Livestock Production Science 29: 131–149.Google Scholar
Dekkers, J. C. M. 1992. Asymptotic response to selection on best linear unbiased predictors of breeding values. Animal Production 54: 351–360.Google Scholar
Dekkers, J. C. M. and Jairath, L. K. 1994. Requirements and uses of genetic evaluations for conformation and herd life. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol 17, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar
Ducrocq, V., Quaas, R. L., Pollak, E. J. and Cassella, G. 1988. Length of productive life of dairy cows. 2. Variance component estimation and sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3071–3079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmans, G. C. 1994. Effective energy: a concept of energy utilisation applied across species. British Journal of Nutrition 71: 801–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esslemont, R. J. and Peeler, E. J. 1993. The scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal 149: 537–547.Google Scholar
Foster, W. W., Freeman, A. E., Berger, P. J. and Kuck, A. 1989. Association of type traits scored linearly with production and herdlife of Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2651–2664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, G. S. and Allaire, F. R. 1976. Relationship of age at first calving, days open, days dry, and herdlife to a profit function for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 59: 1131–1139.Google Scholar
Groen, A. F. 1989. Cattle breeding goals and production circumstances. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics USA 28: 476–490.Google Scholar
Lindley, D. V. 1965. Introduction to probability and statistics from a Bayesian viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Luijkx, R., Werf, J. H. J. van der and Lugt, A. van der. 1992. Estimation of parameters and prediction of functional herd life based on type traits. Publication, Department of Annual Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, no. 26.Google Scholar
Moav, R. 1973. Economic evaluation of genetic differences. In Agricultural genetics: selected topics, (ed. Moav, R.), pp. 319–353. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. E. 1986. Economic evaluation of breeding objectives in dairy cattle. Intensive specialised milk production in temperate zones. Proceedings of the third world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Lincoln, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M. and Robertson, A. 1950. Some aspects of longevity in dairy cattle. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 18: 49–56.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. and Rendel, J. M. 1950. The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle, journal of Genetics 50: 21–31.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. W., Arendonk, J. A. M. van and McDaniel, B. T. 1988. Influence of involuntary culling on optimum culling rates and annualised net revenue. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3463–3469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. W., Dentine, M. R., Miedema, I. and Norman, H. D. 1990. Relationships among non-yield culling and linear type traits in Holsteins. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production vol. 14, pp. 213–216.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. W., Hargrove, G. L., Lawlor, T. J. and Ebersole, J. L. 1991. Correlations among linear type traits and somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1087–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sales, J. and Hill, W. G. 1976. Effect of sampling errors on efficiency of selection indices. 2. Use of information on associated traits for improvment of a single trait. Animal Production 23: 1–14.Google Scholar
Short, T. H. and Lawlor, T. J. 1992. Genetic-parameters of conformation traits, milk yield and herd life in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1987–1998.Google Scholar
Stott, A. W. 1994. The economic advantage of longevity in the dairy cow. Journal of Agricultural Economics 45: 113–122.Google Scholar
Stott, A. W., Veerkamp, R. F. and Emmans, G. C. 1994. Modelling to establish the economic value of longevity in the dairy cow. Forty-fourth annual meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M. 1994. Bias in genetic R2 from half sib designs. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 18, pp. 394–397.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Bowman, P. J. and Goddard, M. E. 1994. Breeding objectives for pasture based dairy production systems. Livestock Production Science 40: 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, D. J. and Cassel, B. G. 1994. Differences in multiple trait prediction of transmitting abilities for herdlife due to data source. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph, vol. 17, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar