Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:31:56.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. II. Some sources of error when sampling oesophageally fistulated sheep at pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. P. Langlands
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia
Get access

Extract

Some possible sources of error when sampling oesophageally fistulated sheep at pasture were examined in eleven trials. Samples collected from sheep asted for varying periods of up to 22 hours did not differ significantly in nitrogen content from samples collected from unfasted sheep. There was no significant difference between the nitrogen content of extrusa collected at the start of a 30-minute period and that of extrusa collected at the end of the period. Sheep transferred from a perennial ryegrass/clover pasture to a native pasture for three months ingested herbage containing 3·80% nitrogen when returned to the original pasture. Control sheep which had remained on the ryegrass/clover pasture selected material containing 3·33% nitrogen. In a further trial sheep transferred from a ryegrass/clover pasture to a Phalaris/ clover pasture consumed herbage with an organic matter digestibility of 70·8 % which contained 3·44 % nitrogen. The material consumed by similar sheep which had grazed the Phalaris/clover pasture for 18 months was 71·5% digestible and contained 3·63% nitrogen.

Diurnal changes in the digestibility and nitrogen content of the diet of free-grazing sheep were observed in two trials. Diurnal changes in nitrogen content were similar on different days but changes in digestibility were relatively smaller and less repeatable between days.

Consistent differences in the composition of the diet selected by individual sheep and selected on different days were observed in a further five trials. Variation between sheep and between days in the nitrogen content of the diet was ±5·6% and ±7·4% respectively, both estimates being expressed as coefficients of variation. Corresponding estimates for digestibility, calculated as standard deviations, were ±1·6 and ±1·3 units. The implications of these results when sampling oesophageally fistulated sheep at pasture are considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, G. W., McManus, W. R., Bush, I. G., & Ball, J., 1964. The use of sheep fitted with oesophageal fistulas to measure diet quality. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 4: 7179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Corbett, J. L., & McDonald, I., 1960. The indirect estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. II. Regressions of digestibility on faecal nitrogen concentration; their determination in continuous digestibility trials and the effect of various factors on their accuracy. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 55: 377385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, R. J., 1954. Measurement of feed intake of grazing cattle and sheep. v. Estimation of the feed-to-faeces ratio from the nitrogen content of the faeces of pasture fed cattle. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech., A36: 1520.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., 1965. Diurnal variation in the diet selected by free-grazing sheep. Nature, Lond., 207: 666667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langlands, J. P., 1966. Studies on the nutritive Value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. I. Differences in composition between herbage consumed and material collected from oesophageal fistulae. Anim. Prod., 8: 253259.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. S., & Hartley, H. O., 1962. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians. Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, R., 1947. Preliminary survey of the natural pastures of the New England District of New South Wales and a general discussion of their problems. Court. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. Bull. No. 210, pp. 26.Google Scholar