Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:30:22.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of sodium hydroxide-treated straw in rations for beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. H. Cuthbert ,
W. S. Thickett ,
P. N. Wilson  and
T. Brigstocke
N. H. Cuthbert
Affiliation:
BOCM Silcock Ltd, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2EQ
W. S. Thickett
Affiliation:
BOCM Silcock Ltd, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2EQ
P. N. Wilson
Affiliation:
BOCM Silcock Ltd, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2EQ
T. Brigstocke
Affiliation:
BOCM Silcock Ltd, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2EQ
Get access

Abstract

Sixty-four British Friesian castrated male cattle (steers) with an average starting weight of 292 kg and an average slaughter weight of 460 kg were used to compare compound diets containing 0, 10, 20 or 30% NaOH-treated straw. A basic diet of 1·8 kg hay, 1·8 kg barley straw and sugar beet pulp, on a scale rising from 1·4 to 2·8 kg according to live weight, was given throughout the trial. Compound diets were individually offered on a scale starting at 3·8 kg rising to 5·8 kg with an average intake of 4·9 kg/day. Treatments did not differ significantly in respect of live-weight gain, which ranged from 0·94 kg/day with the control to 0·97 kg/day with the 30% NaOH-treated straw compound. The grading of the animals, based on the Meat and Livestock Classification scheme, also showed no significant difference.

A second trial with a further 64 British Friesian steers tested inclusion levels of 0, 30,45 and 60% treated straw in a compound diet. At the start of the trial, the cattle averaged 328 kg live weight and were slaughtered from 450 kg live weight. Animals were yarded in store condition and were given a combination of grass silage and compound diets according to a scale, based on live weight and a predicted performance of 1 kg live-weight gain per day. There were no significant differences between treatments in live-weight gain, which ranged from 0·97 kg on the control to 1·02 kg/day on the 45% NaOH-treated straw diet. There was some refusal on the 60% NaOH-treated straw diet in respect of twice daily allocations, with a few cattle on occasions not being able to consume the allowance in the 30 min provided. However, each feed allocation was always consumed before the next meal. There were no significant differences between treatments in respect of fat class, but cattle on the 45% treated-straw diet had statistically superior conformation compared with the control.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 161 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckmann, E. 1921. Conversion of grain straw and lupins into feeds of high nutrient value. Festschr. Kaiser Wilhelm Ges. Fordemng Wiss. zehnjdhrigen Jubilaum, pp. 18–26.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, M. L., Singh, U. B. and Ranjhan, S. K. 1973. Effect of alkali treatment of wheat straw on feed consumption, digestibility and volatile fatty acid production in cattle and buffalo calves. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 43: 677–682.Google Scholar
Choung, C. C. and McManuss, W. R. 1976. Studies on forage cell walls. 3. Effects of feeding alkali-treated rice hulls to sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, E., Adeleye, I. O. A. and Jones, T. A. O. C. 1969. Effects of urea supplementation on the nutritive value of NaOH-treated oat straw. In Celluloses and their Applications (ed. Gould, R. F.), pp. 328–342. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. 1942. The digestibility of wheat straw and wheat-straw pulp. Biochem. J. 36: 786–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Carmona, J. F. and Mehmed, E. A. 1973. Sodium hydroxide treatment of straw; economic problems and possible solutions. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 24: 494–495.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. G. 1977. Review Article: the alkali treatment of straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2: 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeng, W. J., Mowat, D. N. andBiLANKSi, W. K. 1971. Digestibility of sodium hydroxide-treated straw fed alone or in combination with alfalfa silage. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 743–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rexen, F., Stigsen, P. and Kristensen, V. FRIIS. 1976. The effect of a new alkali technique on the nutritive value of straws. In Feed Energy Sources for Livestock (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 65–82. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, J. 1976. Alternatives to conventional cereals. In Feed Energy Sources for Livestock (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 13–27. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, S. K., Otierby, D. E., Donker, J. D. and Good, A. L. 1971. Effects of feeding alkali-treated oat straw supplemented with soybean meal or nonprotein nitrogen on growth of lambs and on certain blood and rumen liquor parameters. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, K.C., Ray, S. C. and Talapatra, S. K. 1942. The nutritive value of alkali-treated cereal straws. Indian J. vet Sci. 12: 263–296.Google Scholar
Singh, M. and Jackson, M. G. 1971. The effect of different levels of sodium hydroxide spray treatment of wheat straw on consumption and digestibility by cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, R. A., Spooner, M. C. and Osbourn, D. F. 1975. The feeding value of mixtures of alkali-treated straw and grass silage. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, J. and Piatkowski, B. 1974. [Studies on the chemical degradation of cereal straw. 5. Effect of sodium in NaOH-treated straw on the composition of blood and urine and on the excretion of various compounds.] Arch. Tiererndhr. 24: 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Brigstocke, T. 1977. The commercial straw process. Process Biochem. 12(7): 17–20.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. K. and Pigden, W. J. 1964. Effect of a sodium hydroxide treatment on the utilization of wheat straw and poplar wood by rumen microorganisms. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 122–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar