Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T22:10:53.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body composition of Romney-Southdown cross and Merino sheep foetuses at a constant age and a constant body weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. K. Stephenson
S. K. Stephenson
Affiliation:
School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia
Get access

Extract

1. Body shape and carcass composition have been measured in a dated series of Romney-Southdown cross and Australian Merino sheep foetuses.

2. Large differences in shape exist between the two breed groups and these result from growth rate differences in certain components of the bone and muscle tissue.

3. Carcass composition at any particular foetal weight, however, is more uniform. In relation to body weight, the Merino has a higher proportion of bone in the body but the proportion of muscle is the same in both breed groups. Nevertheless, the distribution of muscle tissue is changed as there s i a higher proportion of muscle in the hind limb of the Romney-Southdown cross.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 1964 , pp. 309 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergström, P. L.—Editor, 1962. The Progeny Testing of Bulls on Their Beef Production Characteristics. Summary of the Reports for the Commission on Cattle Production. (Rome): Commission on Cattle Production, European Association for Animal Production.Google Scholar
Buck, S. F., 1963. A comparison of pigs slaughtered at three different weights. Pts. I and II. J. agric. Sci., 60: 19, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H., 1962. The relationship between the weight of a tissue in a single joint and the total weight of tissue in a side of beef. Anim. Prod., 4: 37.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. & Pomeroy, R. W., 1962. Quantitative anatomical studies of the composition of the pig at 50, 68 and 92 kg. carcass weight. J. agric. Sci., 59: 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., 1940. Farm Animals; Their Breeding, Growth and Inheritance. Edward Arnold & Co., London.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M., 1956. A study of pre-natal growth and development in the sheep. J. agric. Sci., 47: 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. H., 1957. The interrelations of type, performance and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci., 16: 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P., 1940. Growth and development in the pig, with special reference to carcass quality characters. Pts. I, II and III. J. agric. Sci., 30: 276, 387, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pàlsson, H., 1939. Meat qualities in the sheep, with special reference to Scottish breeds and crosses. I, Pt. II. Comparative studies of different breeds and crosses. J. agric. Sci., 29: 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pàlsson, H., 1940. Meat qualities in the sheep with special reference to Scottish breeds and crosses. II, Pt. III. Comparative development of selected individuals of different breeds and crosses as lambs and hoggets. J. agric. Sci., 30: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pàlsson, H., and Vergès, J. B., 1952. Effect of plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. Pts. I and II. J. agric. Sci., 42: 1, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., 1957. Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. Iowa State College Press, Ames, 5th ed.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. K., 1962. Pre-natal growth in Romney × Southdown cross and Australian Merino sheep. II. Carcass conformation in the two breed groups. Aust. J. agric. Res., 13: 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. & Lambourne, L. J., 1960. Pre-natal growth in Romney × Southdown cross and Australian Merino sheep. I. Introduction and external growth patterns in the two breeds. Aust. J. agric. Res., 11: 1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonaker, H. H., 1958. Breeding for beef. Bull. Colo, agric. Exp. Sta., No. 501-S.Google Scholar
Tribe, D. E. & Peel, Lynette, 1963. Body composition of the Kangaroo (Macropus Sp.). Aust.J.Zool, 11: 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloh, N. M., 1963. Relation between carcass composition and live weight of sheep. Nature (Loud.), 197: 809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, L. R., 1948a. The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Pts. II and III. J. agric. Sci., 38: 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R., 1948b. The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Pt. IV. J. agric. Sci., 38: 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar