Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T17:08:27.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of growth and carcass traits in Scottish Blackface lambs sired by genetically lean or fat rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Conington ,
S. C. Bishop ,
A. Waterhouse  and
G. Simm
J. Conington
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
S. C. Bishop
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
A. Waterhouse
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G. Simm
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

An experimental programme was initiated in 1990 to investigate the consequences of selection for reduced fatness in hill sheep and to estimate genetic parameters for carcass traits in the same class of animal. Thirty-two progeny groups of lambs were born as a result of mating Scottish Blackface rams to ewes of the same breed on two Scottish Agricultural College hill farms in 1991 and 1992. Sires were from two divergent selection lines for subcutaneous back fat depth and were selected under ad libitum feeding conditions on an index combining live weight and ultrasonic fat depth at 20 weeks of age. The index was designed to alter body composition but not body weight. Weaned male progeny (reared extensively) were brought together from both farms in August of each year, reared on grass and finished for slaughter on swedes at a target condition score of 3. Measurements taken at weaning were: live weight, average ultrasonic measurements of average subcutaneous fat depth and muscle depth. At slaughter, traits measured were: pre-slaughter live weight, pre-slaughter condition score, age at slaughter, cold carcass weight, killing-out proportion, Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) fat class and MLC conformation class. Side and shoulder dissections were made on proportionally 0·2 and 0·8 of lambs respectively and lean tissue, subcutaneous fat, intermuscular fat and bone were measured. Comparisons were made between the two genetic lines and genetic parameters were estimated from data adjusted to three different ‘end-points’: constant dissected subcutaneous fat weight, constant age at slaughter and constant cold carcass weight. Moderate to low heritability estimates were obtained for most traits: pre-slaughter live weight = 0·36, cold carcass weight = 0·39, fat class = 0·13, conformation class = 0·09, lean weight = 0·27, bone weight = 0·36 (constant subcutaneous fatness), intermuscular fat = 0·20, subcutaneous fat = 0·20 (constant cold carcass weight). Correlations between ultrasonic measurements at weaning, and slaughter and dissected carcass components were moderate to weak. However, there is sufficient genetic variation in the carcass traits to warrant inclusion in breeding goals for hill sheep. The results also show that genetic differences obtained by selection under intensive rearing conditions for divergent fatness are also seen in progeny reared under extensive (hill) conditions.

Keywords

carcass compositionextensive husbandrygenetic parameterslive weightsheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , October 1998 , pp. 299 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, S. C. 1993. Selection for predicted carcass lean content in Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal Production 56: 379–386.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. D. and Bracken, J. 1992. Selection for carcass lean content in a terminal sire breed of sheep. Animal Production 54: 367–377.Google Scholar
Conington, J., Bishop, S. C., Waterhouse, A. and Simm, G. 1995. A genetic analysis of early growth and ultrasonic measurements in hill sheep. Animal Science 61: 85–93.Google Scholar
Conniffe, D. and Moran, M. A. 1972. Double sampling with regression in comparative studies of carcass composition. Biometrics 28:1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. L., Jones, D. W. and Kempster, A. J. 1983. A note on a simple criterion for choosing among sample joints for use in double sampling. Animal Production 36:493–495.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation — to assess beef and lamb variation. In Symposium on aspects of carcass evaluation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production, pp.113–122.Google Scholar
Fennessy, P. F., Bain, W. E., Greer, G. J. and Johnstone, P. D. 1992. Carcass characteristics of progeny from ram lambs selected for high or low ultrasonic backfat thickness. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 35:177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, N. M., Brash, L. D. and Gilmour, A. R. 1994. Genetic parameters for reproduction and lamb production and their components and liveweight, fat depth and wool production in Hyfer sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45:443–457.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A. R., Luff, A. F., Fogarty, N. M. and Banks, R. 1994. Genetic parameters for ultrasound fat depth and eye muscle measurements in live Poll Dorset sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45:1281–1291.Google Scholar
Henniñgsson, T. and Malmfors, G. 1995. The relationship between live weight of Swedish lambs at 120 days of age and carcass traits. In Production of lamb meat in accordance with market demand. Proceedings of the Scandinavian Association of Agricultural Scientists seminar no. 256. Hvammeyri Agricultural College, Iceland, June 1995.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Grantley-Smith, M. 1986. National estimates of body composition of British cattle, sheep and pigs with special reference to trends in fatness. A review. Meat Science 17:107–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1983. GENSTAT, a general statistical program. Numerical Algorithms Group Limited, Oxford.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23:281–293.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1985. Maximum likelihood estimation of variance components for a multivariate mixed model with equal design matrices. Biometrics 41:153–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, C. A., McEwan, J. C., Fennessy, P. F., Bain, W. E., Greer, G. J. and Hickey, S. M. 1997. Selection for high or low backfat depth in Coopworth sheep: juvenile traits. Animal Science 65:93–103.Google Scholar
Solis-Ramirez, J., Blair, H. T. and Purchas, R. W. 1993. Direct and correlated responses to selection for high or low ultrasonic backfat in Southdown sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 36:133–141.Google Scholar
Waldron, D. F., Clarke, J. N., Rae, A. L., Kirton, A. H. and Bennett, G. L. 1992. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for selection to improve lamb carcass traits. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 35:287–298.Google Scholar