Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T04:32:56.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of long and shredded cereal straw for beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. J. F. Mira ,
M. Kay  and
E. A. Hunter
J. J. F. Mira
Affiliation:
The North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
M. Kay
Affiliation:
The North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
E. A. Hunter
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Statistics, May field Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
Get access

Abstract

Thirty Hereford × Friesian steers initially weighing 320 kg were used in two experiments, to compare the effects of mechanical processing of barley straw and the amount of rolled barley offered on intake and live-weight gain. The straw was offered ad libitum either in the long form or shredded through a 40 mm screen and supplemented with 20, 35 and 50 g barley DM per kgW"75 per day (L, M and H respectively). A solution providing 12 g urea per kg straw dry matter (DM) was sprayed onto the straw and all the animals were offered daily 480 g of soya bean meal with minerals and vitamins. In the first experiment, which had a change-over design, the animals were weighed at the beginning and the end of each period. The daily consumption of shredded straw (kg DM) was L 3·38, M 3·29 and H 3·00 and of long straw L 3·94, M 4·02 and H 3·56 (s.e. of difference, 0·29). There were significant differences in straw intake between steers offered the long and the shredded straw (P < 0·001) but no differences in intake when different amounts of barley were offered within the same physical form of straw. The mean daily live-weight gains for treatments L, M and H respectively were 0·25, 0·66 and 0·80 kg for steers given shredded straw and 0·32, 0·62 and 0·87 kg (s.e. of difference, 0·1) for those offered long straw. At the end of the first experiment the same animals were kept for a further 10 weeks on the same straw treatment but only treatments L and H were continued, the steers from treatment M being distributed between L and H. The straw intakes and live-weight gains were in agreement with those observed in the first experiment

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 87 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. P., Escuder-Volonte, J., Curran, M. K. and Holmes, W. 1972. The influence of supplements of energy and protein on the intake and performance of cattle fed on cereal straws. Anim. Prod. 15: 167–176.Google Scholar
Beardsley, D. W. 1964. Symposium on forage utilization: nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. Part II. Beef cattle and sheep studies. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. and Milne, J. A. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for milking cattle. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Ser.) 1: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. J., Raven, A. M. and Irwin, J. H. D. 1969. The use of coarsely milled barley straw in finishing diets for young beef cattle. J, agric. Sci., Camb. 73: 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. 1965. Some aspects of pasture evaluation. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 231–242. Publn Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., 11. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Greenhaloh, J. F. D. and Wainman, F. W. 1972. The nutritive value of processed roughages for fattening cattle and sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Ser.) 1: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, G. M. and Kay, M. 1979. The effect of mechanical processing and urea on straw intake using steers. Anim. Prod. 28: 433 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1972. Processed roughage in diets containing cereals for ruminants. In Cereal Processing and Digestion, pp. 39–52. US Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E., Swan, H. and Clarke, R. T. 1966. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. I. Substitution of maize by milled barley straw in a beef fattening diet and its effect on performance and carcass quality. Anim. Prod. 8: 303–311.Google Scholar
Lyons, T., Caffrey, P. J. and O'Connell, W. J. 1970. The effect of energy, protein and vitamin supplementation on the performance and voluntary intake of barley straw by cattle. Anim. Prod. 12: 323–334.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1963. The effect of pelleting and watering on the feeding value of roughage — a review. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 1. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 569–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, L. A. 1964. Symposium on forage utilization: nutritive value of forage as affected by physical form. Part I. General principles involved with ruminants and effect of feeding pelleted or wafered forage to dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, D. W., Swan, H. and Lamming, G. E. 1969. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 4. The use of ground straw of different particle sizes for cattle from twelve weeks of age. Anim. Prod. 11: 543–550.Google Scholar
Pirie, R. and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1978. Alkali treatment of straw for ruminants. 1. Utilization of complete diets containing straw by beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, H. and Clarke, V. J. 1974. The use of processed straw in rations for ruminants. In Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers 8 (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 205–235. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, H. and Lamming, G. E. 1970. Studies on the nutrition of ruminants. 5. The effect of diets containing up to 70% ground barley straw on the live-weight gain and carcass composition of yearling Friesian cattle. Anim. Prod. 12: 63–70.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. and Smith, J. S. 1972. The utilization of the energy of artificially dried grass prepared in different ways. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1972. Act of eating and its relation to the heat increment of feed in ruminants. In Proc. int. Symp. Envir. Physiol. Bioenergetics (ed. Smith, R. E.), pp. 42–48. Fedn. Am. Socs exp. Biol.Google Scholar