Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T13:57:43.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a synthetic pig sire line by election with immigration 2. Immigration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. Webb
A. J. Webb
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

A synthetic sire line has been developed over 11 generations by a process of selection accompanied by immigration. In each generation prospective immigrants of any breed were mated to native pigs already i n the Sire Line, and, ignoring breed, their progeny were given the same opportunity of being selected as the progeny from matings involving natives alone. This method of immigration is shown to be biased as a result of (a) heterosis in crosses of immigrants with natives, and (b) treating natives and immigrants as if they were members of the same population. When affected by both sources of bias, the breeding values of inferior immigrant progeny may be seriously overestimated with the result that inferior genes may enter the native population and hold back genetic progress. Methods of removing the bias and alternative systems of immigration are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 245 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bichard, M., Pease, A. H. R., Swales, P. H. and Ozkutuk, K. 1973. Selection in a population with overlapping generations. Anim. Prod. 17: 215–227.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E. P. 1969. The relative efficiencies of selection indexes. Acta Agric. scand. 19: 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1963. Selection index and expected genetic advance. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (ed. Hanson, W. D. and Robinson, H. F.), pp. 141–163. National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council Publn No. 982, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, J. W. 1966. Selection from one or several populations. Aust. J. agric. Res. 11: 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellier, P. 1970. [Heterosis and crossing in the pig.] Annls Genet. Sel. anim. 2: 145–207.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. and Kino, J. W. B. 1976. Development of a synthetic pig sire line by selection with immigration. 1. Results of selection and heritability estimates. Anim. Prod. 22: 231–244.Google Scholar