Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T15:23:58.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digestibility by pigs of the major chemical components of diets high in plant cell-wall constituents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. J. Farrell
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University New England, Armidale, N.S.W., 2351, Australia
Get access

Summary

Digestibility of the major chemical components in diets high in plant cell-wall constituents was determined with four pigs. Two were given a commercial pig meal and two were given, in addition, alkali-treated straw (25% of the diet). Dry-matter digestibility of the straw was 32%, and protein excretion in faeces was increased by the addition of straw to the basal diet. Calculations based on microbial protein synthesis per gram of organic matter fermented showed that the additional nitrogen in the faeces may have been almost entirely microbial in origin.

In a second experiment, ground lucerne was progressively introduced into the diet in substitution for commercial pig meal. There was no obvious associative effect on the digestibility of the chemical components examined. Apparent digestibility of dry matter of the all-lucerne diet was 53%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, M. M., Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1963. A metabolic crate and harness suitable for male growing pigs up to bacon weight. J. Anim. Techns Ass. 14: 103.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. and Maynard, L. A. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content t o the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nutr. 15: 383395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranwell, P. D. 1968. Microbial fermentation in the alimentary tract of the pig. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 38: 721730.Google ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, H. M., Friend, D. W. and Nicholson, J. W. G. 1962. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 167175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, D. J. and Johnson, K. A. 1972. Utilization of cellulose by pigs and its effects on caecal function. Anim. Prod. 14: 209217.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. M. and Hamilton, T. S. 1952. The utilization of certain cellulosic materials by swine. J. anim. Sci. 11: 480490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. and Weston, R. H. 1971. The utilization of alkali-treated straw by sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 22: 951962.Google Scholar
Keys, J. E., Van Soest, P. J. and Young, E. P. 1970. Effect of increasing dietary cell wall content on the digestibility of hemicellulose and cellulose in swine and rats. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 11721177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ololade, B. G., Mowat, D. N. and Winch, J. E. 1970. Effect of processing methods on the in vitro digestibility of sodium hydroxide treated roughages. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 657662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 50: 5055.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. and Evans, R. E. 1947. The nutritive value of fodder cellulose from wheat straw. 1. Its digestibility and feeding value when fed to ruminants and pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 37: 202216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar