Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T23:52:21.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of concentrate, barley and dried grass on the voluntary intake of different silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. A. McIlmoyle  and
J. C. Murdoch
W. A. McIlmoyle
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough
J. C. Murdoch
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough
Get access

Summary

In two experiments with steers (initial live weight 339 kg) the effect of dried grass, barley and concentrates on the intake of ‘wilted’ and unwilted grass and whole-crop barley silage was investigated.

In both experiments there was no significant effect of silage type on silage dry-matter intake when given alone or with a supplement. In Experiment 1, supplementation significantly reduced (P<0·05) the intake of silage dry matter (DM) from unwilted and whole-crop barley silage. Total DM intake was significantly higher (P<0·05) for the ‘wilted’ silage diet than for either the unwilted or whole-crop barley silage diets. In Experiment 2, supplementation had no significant effect on total DM intake. Digestible energy intake was significantly higher (P < 0·05) from whole-crop barley silage supplemented with concentrate rather than barley or dried grass and was significantly lower (P<0·05) from unwilted silage diets (P<0·05) when dried grass rather than concentrate or barley was given. In the second experiment, ration digestibility and rate of passage of digesta results are reported.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 393 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. 1950. Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 4: 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. and Davey, A. W. F. 1970. Voluntary intake, digestion, rate of passage, amount of material in the alimentary tract and behaviour in cows receiving complete diets containing straw and concentrates in different proportions. Br. J. Nutr. 24: 1013–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, E. J. 1956. The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. 1. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. Br. J. Nutr. 10: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1970. Silage and milk production: a comparison between grass silages made with and without formic acid. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1975. Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried grass as supplements to silage of high digestibility. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, W. A. and McDonald, P. 1961. Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12: 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1975. Milk production from silage and concentrates containing varying proportions of dried grass and cereals. Anim. Prod. 20: 173–179.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and McIlmoyle, W. A. 1973. Dried grass for milk production. Rep. agric. Res. Inst. Nth. Ire., No. 46, pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
Head, M. J. and Murdoch, J. C. 1965. The influence of supplements of flaked maize on the digestibility by steers of silage, fresh lucerne and lucerne hay. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 20: 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. 1974. The performance of early-weaned calves offered concentrates or artificially dried grasses. Anim. Prod. 18: 201–210.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. 1975. The performance of early-weaned calves offered a high dry-matter silage supplemented with concentrates or dried grass. Anim. Prod. 21: 21–30.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A. and Campling, R. C. 1972. Intake and digestibility by sheep of artificially dried forages in several physical forms. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowat, D. N. and Slumskie, R. A. 1971. Barley silage, ground whole plant barley and corn silage for finishing beef cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1976. Effect of silage additives on the intake and performance of male calves and steers. Anim. Prod. 22: 321–328.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. and Murdoch, J. C. 1977. The effect of dried grass and cereal-based concentrate on the voluntary intake of unwilted grass silage. Anim. Prod. 24: 227–235.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A., Murdoch, J. C. and Gordon, F. J. 1975. A note on dried grass as a component of concentrate mixtures for lactating dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 20: 163–166.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1962. Change-over designs. Tech. Bull. N. Carol. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 147.Google Scholar
Patton, R. A. and Krause, G. F. 1972. A maximum-likelihood estimator of food retention time in ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 28: 19–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. A. 1962. The utilization of Hyparrhenia veld for the nutrition of cattle in the dry season. III. Studies on the digestibility of the produce of mature veld and veld hay, and the effect of feeding supplementary protein and urea. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1973. Dried grass v. barley as a concentrate for milk production. Grass—J.Br. Ass. green Crop Driers No. 6: 3–8.Google Scholar