Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T01:20:45.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of plane of nutrition, diethylstilboestrol implantation and slaughter weight on the performance of Israeli-Friesian intact male cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Levy
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
Y. Folman
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

The effects of two levels of energy intake, ad libitum and 80% of ad libitum, of diethylstilboestrol implantation and no such treatment, and of two slaughter weights (‘450’ and ‘490’ kg), on the performance of Israeli-Friesian intact male cattle were studied.

Average daily gain was 1130 g and 959 g and daily carcass gain was 630 g and 553 g for animals on ad libitum and 80% of ad libitum energy intake, respectively. Average daily gain was 1038 g and 944 g and daily carcass gain was 595 g and 562 g, for diethylstilboestrol-treated and untreated animals, respectively. Slaughter weight had little effect on rate of gain.

The differences in conversion ratio of ME into live weight between treatments were small. Diethylstilboestrol-treated animals were slightly more efficient.

The non-implanted animals on the restricted plane of nutrition and which had been slaughtered at ‘490’ kg had a significantly higher dressing percentage, a higher percentage of fat trim and less bone than animals slaughtered at ‘450’ kg body weight on both levels of nutrition.

Among the diethylstilboestrol-implanted male calves, however, the animals fed at 80% of ad libitum feed and killed at ‘450’ or ‘490’ kg live weight had significantly more fat trim in the carcass and less bone than the animals fed ad libitum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. M., Probert, C. L. and Bohman, V. R. 1966. Growth rate, feed utilization and body composition of young bulls and steers. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 132137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, F. H. and Arthaud, V. H. 1972. Use of hormones or hormone active agents in production of slaughter bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 752754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1968. Growth patterns of bovine muscle, fat and bone. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 611619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucy, L. V. and Bennion, L. L. 1962. Concentrate-roughage levels in diets of fattening steers. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 666667. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. 1950. Comparative studies of meat. IV. Rates of fattening in relation to the deposition of fat and protein in the fatty and muscular tissues of meat carcasses. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 40: 18.Google Scholar
Folman, Y., Drori, D., Holzer, Z. and Levy, D. 1974. Compensatory growth of intensively raised bull calves. III. Restricted refeeding and breed differences. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 788795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folman, Y. and Volcani, R. 1964. Diethylstilbestrol castration of male ruminants and its effect on growth rate, feed efficiency and carcass composition. Spec. Bull. natn. Univ. Inst. Agric, Rehovot, No. 65.Google Scholar
Henrickson, R. L., Pope, L. S. and Hendrickson, R. F. 1965. Effect of rate of gain of fattening beef calves on carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 507513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, D., Holzer, Z., Neumark, H. and Amir, S. 1974. The effects of dietary energy content and level of feeding on the growth of Israeli-Friesian intact male cattle. Anim. Prod. 18: 6773.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Volcani, R. 1968. The effect of age and live weight on feed conversion and yield of saleable meat of intact Israeli-Friesian male calves. Anim. Prod. 10: 325330.Google Scholar
Richardson, D., Smith, E. F., Baker, F. H. and Cox, R. F. 1961. Effects of roughage-concentrate ratio in cattle fattening rations on gains, feed efficiency, digestion and carcass. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 316318.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1967. Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. I. Experimental design, body weight growth, and the effects of developmental growth and body weight loss on the dressed carcass and the offal. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18: 10151031.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. and Tulloh, N. M. 1969. Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. IV. Chemical components of the commercially dressed and jointed carcass. Aust. J. agric. Res. 20: 199211.Google Scholar