No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Erratum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Extract
Animal Production, Volume 6, Part 1, p. 53
In Table 5, the identification numbers of twin pairs should read 3, 4, 1, 2 (and not 1, 2, 3, 4)
- Type
- Erratum
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964