Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T04:40:31.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth, food consumption and litter production of female pigs mated at puberty and at low body weights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. G. Pay  and
T. E. Davies
M. G. Pay
Affiliation:
Beecham Research Laboratories, Nutritional Research Centre, Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Tadworth, Surrey
T. E. Davies
Affiliation:
Beecham Research Laboratories, Nutritional Research Centre, Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Tadworth, Surrey
Get access

Summary

Gilts were allocated at 55 kg live weight to one of three treatments: 1. 1·4 kg of food daily to service, served at puberty, and 1·4 kg of food daily throughout pregnancy.

2. 1·4 kg of food daily to service, served at the third heat, and 1·4 kg of food daily during pregnancy.

3. 2·3 kg of food daily to service, served at the third heat, and 1·4 kg of food daily during pregnancy.

An attempt was made to encourage early puberty by stimulation using the presence of a boar. Natural service with boars was used on all gilts.

There were no significant differences between the treatments in time taken to reach puberty and the gilts were mated at 77, 97 and 116 kg live weight on Treatments 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The gilts on Treatment 1 had a significantly lower conception rate and a significantly smaller litter size than those on Treatments 2 and 3. However, the average birth weight did not vary significantly among treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 85 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, L. L. and Melampy, R. M. 1972. Factors affecting ovulation rate in the pig. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.) pp. 329–366. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1969. The effect of boar presence on the age of puberty of gilts. Rep. Sch. Agric. Univ. Nott. (1968–69), pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1970. The effect of the presence of a boar on the attainment of puberty in gilts. J. Reprod. Fert. 23: 435–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DU, Du MesnilBuisson, F. and Signoret, J. P. 1962. [Influence of external factors on the onset of puberty in the sow.] Annh Zootech. 11: 53–59.Google Scholar
Klotchkov, D. V., Klotchkova, A. Y. and Belyaer, D. K. 1971. The influence of photoperiodic conditions on fertility in gilts. Int. Congress. Anim. Prod. Paris, 1971, Theme II, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Elsley, F. W. H. and Mcpherson, R. M. 1966. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. 1. Reproductive performance. Anim. Prod. 8: 29–38.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F. 1962. Feeding of pregnant sows. Research Report, Anim. Prod. Div., An Foras Talúntais, Dublin, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F. 1963. Feeding of pregnant sows. Research Report, Anim. Prod. Div., An Foras Talúntais, Dublin p. 48.Google Scholar
Reutzel, L. F. and Sumption, L. J. 1968. Genetic and phenotypic relationships involving age at puberty and growth rate of gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnick, A. C., Wiggins, E. L., Casida, L. E., Grummer, R. H. and Chapman, A. B. 1951. Variation in puberty phenomena in inbred gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 10: 479–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed