Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T22:18:32.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The interaction between dietary lipids and fibre in the sheep 1. A comparison of the methods used for crude fibre and acid-detergent fibre estimations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Devendra
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics
D. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics
Get access

Summary

A comparison has been made between the methods for crude fibre (CF) and acid-detergent fibre (MADF) determination. In diets containing 10 to 70 % hay with or without 8 % tallow (T) or maize oil (MO), a highly significant (P < 0·001) correlation of r = 0·95 was observed between CF and MADF estimates. This high correlation confirmed a similar relationship found in silages, concentrate feeds and also hays. Similarly for rumen digesta, a correlation of r = 0·93 was found (P < 0·001). The equation for predicting CF from MADF calculated from diets and digesta data together was CF = 0·503+0·848 (+0030) MADF and the residual variation found was sufficiently small to provide useful estimates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official methods of analysis of the A.O.A.C. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Clancy, M. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966. Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibility and intake of herbage samples. Proc. Xth int. Grassld. Cong., Helsinki, Section 2, Paper No. 22, 445453.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, C. J. 1967. The determination of lignin. Br. J. Nutr. 21: 325332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, G. H., Matrone, G. and Maynard, L. A. 1946. A 72 per cent H2SO4 method for the determination of lignin and its use in animal nutrition studies. J. Anim. Sci. 5: 285297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwistle, V. P. and Hunter, W. L. 1949. Report on crude fibre. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 32: 651656.Google Scholar
Holt, K. E. 1962. Further interim report of the AOCS-AOAC crude fibre liaison committee. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 45: 578584.Google Scholar
Kim, J. T., Gillingham, J. T. and Loadholt, C. B. 1967. Difference in composition between crude fibre and acid-detergent fibre. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 50: 340346.Google Scholar
Maguire, M. F. and Drennan, P. 1967. Proc. C.I.R.C.A. Conf. Dublin, Ireland, p. 143.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. 11. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46: 829835.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1966. Non-nutritive residues: a system of analysis for the replacement of crude fibre. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 49: 546551.Google Scholar
Waite, R., Johnson, M. J. and Armstrong, D. G. 1964. The evaluation of artificially dried grass as a source of energy for sheep. 1. The effect of stage of maturity on the apparent digestibility of rye-grass, cocksfoot and timothy. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62: 391398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar