Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-14T22:40:31.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low glucosinolate full-fat rapeseed meal in the diets of early-weaned piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. P. Gill
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
A. G. Taylor
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

The potential of using low glucosinolate full-fat rapeseed meal (FFR) in the diets of early-weaned piglets was investigated in this experiment. FFR (containing 17 (xmol total glucosinolates and 2·8 mg erucic acid per g of whole seed) was used on an isonitrogenous basis at either 200 g<kg or 400 g<kg to replace full-fat soya-bean meal. Four replicates of three contemporary pen groups of 10 piglets weaned between 3 and 4 weeks of age were randomly allocated at a mean initial weight of 8·41 (s.e. 1·105) kg to the three dietary treatments. The experimental diets were given for 3 weeks. Inclusion of FFR significantly depressed food intake, daily live-weight gain and food conversion. There were no significant differences between the performance of piglets given either 200 or 400 g FFR per kg. Intakes of the diets containing FFR per unit of metabolic body weight as a proportion of the control diet decreased from about 0·85 to 0·75 from the 1st to the last week of the feeding period. This suggested that the acceptability of diets containing FFR decreased with time, possibly due to the presence of unpalatable and perhaps antinutritive factors which may include glucosinolates although present at relatively low concentrations. It was concluded that the feeding value of FFR would need to be improved by development of oilseed rape varieties with much lower levels of glucosinolates.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baidoo, S. K., McIntosh, M. K. and Ahernl, F. X. 1986. Selection preference of starter pigs fed canola meal and soybean meal supplemented diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66: 10391049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. M. 1984. Nutrients and toxicants in rapeseed meal: a review. Journal of Animal Science 58: 9961010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CANOLA COUNCIL. 1980. Canola Council Trade Mark No. 243, 1983. Registered 18 April 1980. Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
Daun, J. K. 1986. Glucosinolates levels in Western Canadian rapeseed and Canola. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 63: 639643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, J. A. and Atchley, A. A. 1986. Handbook of Proximate Analysis Tables of Higher Plants, pp. 2829. CRC Press, Florida.Google Scholar
European Economic Communities. 1987. Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 1980/87 of 6 July 1987 amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2681/83 laying down detailed rules for the application of the subsidy system for oils seed. Official Journal of the European Communities, No. L 18715 30: 5.Google Scholar
Josefsson, E. and Munck, L. 1973. Influence of genetically determined differences in glucosinolate content on the nutritional value of rapeseed meal. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 24: 12651271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, P. A. and Hill, R. 1983. Voluntary food intake of growing pigs given diets containing rapeseed meal, from different types and varieties of rape, as the only protein supplement. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 661671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, P. A., Pittam, S. and Hill, R. 1984. The voluntary food intake by growing pigs of diets containing ‘treated’ rapeseed meal or extracts of rapeseed meal. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 159164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, J., Fenton, T. W., Meuller, M. M. and Clandinin, D. R. 1979. Condensed tannins in rapeseed meal. Journal of Food Science 44: 13131316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, M. K. and Aherne, F. X. 1982. The taste preference of piglets fed soyabean meal and Canola meal supplemented diets. 61st Annual Feeder's Day Report, Agriculture and Forestry Bulletin, University of Alberta, pp. 7475.Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. K., Baidoo, S. and Aherne, F. X. 1983. The effects of flavour additives on the consumption of canola meal by starter pigs. 62nd Annual Feeder's Day Report, Agriculture and Forestry Bulletin, University of Alberta, pp. 127128.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. and Aherne, F. X. 1987. An evaluation of the feeding value of full-fat Canola seed for weanling pigs. 66th Annual Feeder's Day Report, Agriculture and Forestry Bulletin, University of Alberta, pp. 79.Google Scholar
Singham, A. D. R. and Lawrence, T. L. J. 1979. Acceptability and nitrogen utilisation of Tower and Erglu rapeseed meals by the growing pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30: 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed.Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Van etten, C. H., McGrew, C. E. and Daxenbichler, M. E. 1974. Glucosinolate determination in cruciferous seeds and meals by measurement of enzymatically released glucose. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 22: 483487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed